Onset Patterns in Autism: Correspondence Between Home Video and Parent Report
Open accessAbstract
Objective The onset of autism is usually conceptualized as occurring in one of two patterns, early onset or regressive. This study examined the number and shape of trajectories of symptom onset evident in coded home movies of children with autism and examined their correspondence with parent report of onset.Method Four social-communicative behaviors were coded from the home video of children with autism (n = 52) or typical development (n = 23). All home videos from 6 through 24 months of age were coded (3199 segments). Latent class modeling was used to characterize trajectories and determine the optimal number needed to describe the coded home video. These trajectories were then compared with parent reports of onset patterns, as defined by the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised.Results A three-trajectory model best fit the data from the participants with autism. One trajectory displayed low levels of social-communication across time. A second trajectory displayed high levels of social-communication early in life, followed by a significant decrease over time. A third trajectory displayed initial levels of behavior that were similar to the typically developing group but little progress in social-communication with age. There was poor correspondence between home video-based trajectories and parent report of onset.Conclusions More than two onset categories may be needed to describe the ways in which symptoms emerge in children with autism. There is low agreement between parent report and home video, suggesting that methods for improving parent report of early development must be developed.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous longitudinal studies of high-risk infant siblings have suggested that ASD onset may be more complex and less homogeneous than previously understood, both with respect to timing and the consolidation of symptoms into a clear diagnostic profile.
“Previous longitudinal studies of high-risk infant siblings [23, 34, 52] have suggested that ASD onset may be more complex and less homogeneous than previously understood [1, 33, 35], both with respect to timing and the consolidation of symptoms into a clear diagnostic profile [51].”
From Behavioral, cognitive, and adaptive development in infants with autism spectrum disorder in the first 2 years of life (2015) · cites this paper as [35]
Recent research has indicated only modest agreement between retroactively reported regression and analysis of behavioral change as observed on serial home videos.
“Recent research has indicated only modest agreement between retroactively reported regression and analysis of behavioral change as observed on serial home videos 9”
From Early Intervention for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder Under 3 Years of Age: Recommendations for Practice and Research (2015) · cites this paper as [9]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 151
- Authors
- Ozonoff, S., Iosif, A.-M., Young, G. S., Hepburn, S., Thompson, M., Colombi, C., Cook, I. C., Werner, E., Goldring, S., Baguio, F., & Rogers, S. J.
- Affiliations
- University of California Davis Medical Center (US)
- University of California, Davis (US)
- University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ozonoff, Sally
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 796-806.e1
- ISSN
- 0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3668453
- OpenAlex
- W2014600812
- Cited by
- 151
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 5.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (L30 HD048361, U19HD035468, U19-HD35468-08)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Keywords
- early-onset autism, regressive autism, home video, parent report, social communication development, latent class analysis, developmental trajectories, ADI-R
- MeSH terms
- Autistic Disorder, Behavioral Symptoms, California, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Colorado, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Parents, Regression, Psychology, Social Behavior, Video Recording, Case-Control Studies, Age of Onset, Observation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review