Cited by 17Art Therapy and Mental HealthChild Therapy and DevelopmentThemes in Literature Analysis

Bringing Bibliotherapy for Children to Clinical Practice

Mendel, Marisa Rory, Harris, Jennifer, Carson, Nicholas·2016·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.05.008

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mendel, M. R., Harris, J., & Carson, N.
Affiliations
Cambridge Health Alliance (US)
Corresponding author
Mendel, Marisa Rory
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-07
Volume
55
Issue
7
Pages
535-537
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2469475959
Cited by
17
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
20.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Therapy and Development
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Themes in Literature Analysis
Keywords
bibliotherapy, children's literature, child psychiatry, clinical practice, book recommendations, child mental health
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Bibliotherapy, Child, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review