Cited by 113Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder After Age 5 in Children Evaluated Longitudinally Since Infancy

Open access
Ozonoff, Sally, Young, Gregory S., Brian, Jessica, Charman, Tony, Shephard, Elizabeth, Solish, Abbie, Zwaigenbaum, Lonnie·2018·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective The diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has been found to be remarkably stable but few studies have followed children not initially diagnosed with ASD beyond 3 years of age to examine late or delayed diagnoses. The present study used a prospective familial-risk design to identify children who had undergone multiple comprehensive assessments in preschool and were determined to be negative for ASD only to meet criteria for ASD when tested in middle childhood.Method Data were pooled across 3 research teams studying later-born siblings of children with ASD. Fourteen children met inclusion criteria for the late-diagnosed group and were compared with a large sample of high- and low-risk siblings from the same sites who had ASD or typical development (TD) outcomes at 3 years of age.Results As a group, the late-diagnosed children scored between the TD and ASD groups on most measures administered at 3 years and differed significantly from the ASD group on most measures. However, there was significant heterogeneity among the late-diagnosed cases. Seven showed very little evidence of ASD in preschool, whereas 7 demonstrated subtle, subthreshold symptomatology.Conclusion Some children with ASD might present with a subtle phenotype early in life or show a prolonged time course of symptom development. This emphasizes the need for screening and surveillance schedules that extend past 36 months and continued evaluation of any child who presents with atypical early development and/or high-risk status. The findings also shed light on reasons why the mean age of ASD diagnosis remains older than 4 years.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaac.2018.06.022

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Challenges to widespread adoption of the best validated instruments, the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R) and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2nd Edition (ADOS-2), include the cost of the instruments and training, the time required to complete them, and the need for substantial training to use them reliably.

    “These challenges include the cost of the instruments and training, the time required to complete them and the need for substantial training to use them reliably 132”

    From Autism spectrum disorder (2020) · cites this paper as [132]

    The Method > Measures section says that clinical examiners administering the ADOS were trained to research-reliability standards. It does not say that substantial training is required, or discuss instrument and training costs, completion time, or barriers to widespread adoption of the ADI-R and ADOS-2. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ozonoff, S., Young, G. S., Brian, J., Charman, T., Shephard, E., Solish, A., & Zwaigenbaum, L.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Bloorview Research Institute (CA)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Ozonoff, Sally
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
57
Issue
11
Pages
849-857.e2
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2890969706
Cited by
113
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 2
FWCI
7.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01s MH068398, MH109541)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Kids Brain Health Network
  • Ontario Mental Health Foundation
  • UK Medical Research Council (G0701484, MR/K021389/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, delayed diagnosis, diagnostic stability, symptom onset, child development monitoring, screening schedules, siblings of autistic children, vulnerable children, preschool assessment, longitudinal follow-up
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Phenotype, Population Surveillance, Prospective Studies, Risk, Prevalence, Siblings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review