In vitro assessments of UVA protection by popular sunscreens available in the United States
Abstract
Background The importance of adequate ultraviolet A (UVA) protection has become apparent with improved understanding of the mechanism of UVA-induced damage to tissues. Currently in the United States, there is no regulation on testing and labeling of sunscreens for UVA protection. In August 2007, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) addressed this issue in a proposed rule. Objectives We sought to assess in vitro the degree of UVA protection provided by 13 popular sunscreen products that are commercially available in the United States. Method Thirteen sunscreen products were purchased. UVA protection of each product was measured and assessed with 3 in vitro UVA labeling indices: (1) the FDA Proposed Amendment of Final Monograph, August 27, 2007; (2) European Commission Recommendation--the Colipa and critical wavelength methods; (3) and United Kingdom's Boots star rating system. Results Based on the new FDA-proposed guidelines, 8 products achieved the medium protection category, and 5 products achieved high protection. The latter 5 products also fulfilled the UVA protection based on the Colipa guideline desired by the European Commission Recommendation. Nine products achieved the desired critical wavelength value of 370 or higher. Based on the United Kingdom's Boots star rating system, 6 products achieved a rating of 3 stars, and the remaining 7 products achieved no star rating. Limitations The study only evaluated a small number of sunscreen products, and only in vitro methods were used to assess the degree of UVA protection. Conclusions The majority of the tested sunscreens in this study offered a medium degree of UVA protection. Compared with the sunscreens in the past, this study shows that UVA protection of sunscreens has improved. Sunscreens with avobenzone and octocrylene provided a higher degree of UVA protection. Globally, there is no uniform standard on testing and labeling sunscreens for UVA protection. In the United States, the FDA has just started to create a much-needed standard. This effort is necessary to educate the public better on how to choose products with adequate UVA protection.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is growing convergence towards a general principle of testing and labeling for UVA protection, and in many cases products fulfilling criteria in one region would also satisfy criteria in other countries or regions.
“Despite these diverse standards across the globe, there is a growing convergence towards the general principle of testing and labeling for UVA protection, and in many cases, products that fulfilled the criteria in one region would also satisfy the criteria in other countries or regions (81).”
From Photoprotection: a Review of the Current and Future Technologies (2010) · cites this paper as [81]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 14 · Cited by 86
- Authors
- Wang, S. Q., Stanfield, J. W., & Osterwalder, U.
- Affiliations
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Steven Q.
- ORCID
- Osterwalder, Uli
- Venue
- Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 934-942
- ISSN
- 0190-9622 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2014671965
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 6.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular and Laser Science Research
- Keywords
- UVA protection, sunscreen, ultraviolet radiation, sunscreen labeling, avobenzone, octocrylene, UVA-induced skin damage
- MeSH terms
- Acrylates, Propiophenones, Sunscreening Agents, Ultraviolet Rays, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration, Chalcones, In Vitro Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review