Cited by 76Global Health Workforce IssuesDiversity and Career in MedicineHealthcare Policy and Management

The dermatology work force: A focus on urban versus rural wait times

Uhlenhake, Elizabeth, Brodell, Robert, Mostow, Eliot·2009·Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

Abstract

Background Recent studies suggest a shortage of dermatologists with an average wait time of 36 days in the United States and 40 days in Ohio for a routine dermatology visit. To date, no previous studies have examined supply and demand of dermatology services in rural versus urban populations.Objective We sought to determine the average wait time for a dermatology appointment for new and established patients in both urban and rural areas.Methods The offices of 250 dermatologists in Ohio were contacted by telephone to determine the wait time for the next available appointment for new and established patients with a changing mole.Results The average wait time for new (4.5 weeks) and established (3.1 weeks) patients was similar to times reported in previous studies. A greater density of all dermatologists and medical (general) dermatologists practice in cities, but wait times were not statistically different in rural versus urban settings.Limitations Neither insurance status or use of physician extenders were considered. The findings may not be applicable to areas outside Ohio.Conclusion There is a shortage of medical dermatologists throughout Ohio. Training more medical dermatologists or adding physician extenders to dermatology practices would be expected to decrease the waiting time for dermatology appointments. Providing incentives for dermatologists to practice in underserved rural areas may not be necessary judging by the similarities in wait times between rural and urban settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaad.2008.09.008

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Various authors have reported difficulties in obtaining an appointment with a dermatologist.

    “However, various authors have reported difficulties in obtaining an appointment with a dermatologist [12,14-17].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Uhlenhake, E., Brodell, R., & Mostow, E.
Affiliations
  • Northeast Ohio Medical University (US)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
Corresponding author
Mostow, Eliot
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-07
Volume
61
Issue
1
Pages
17-22
ISSN
0190-9622 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984442206
Cited by
76
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Global Health Workforce Issues
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
Keywords
dermatology workforce, physician shortage, appointment wait times, urban-rural disparities, physician extenders, Ohio
MeSH terms
Workforce, Appointments and Schedules, Dermatology, Humans, Ohio, Rural Population, Skin Diseases, Urban Population, Waiting Lists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review