Cited by 32Skin Protection and AgingNonmelanoma Skin Cancer StudiesEconomic and Financial Impacts of Cancer

Are sunscreens luxury products?

Mahé, Emmanuel, Beauchet, Alain, de Maleissye, Marie-Florence, Saiag, Philippe·2011·Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

Abstract

Background The incidence of skin cancers is rapidly increasing in Western countries. One of the main sun-protection measures advocated is application of sunscreen. Some studies report a failure to comply with sunscreen application guidance. One explanation is their cost. Objective To evaluate the true cost of sunscreen in two situations: a 4-member family spending 1 week at the beach and a transplant patient respecting all the sun protection recommendations. Methods We performed an analysis of prices of sunscreens sold via Internet drugstores in Europe and North America. Standard sunscreen application recommendations were followed. We tested the recommended amount of sunscreen to be applied (ie, 2 mg/cm(2)). Results Six hundred seven sunscreens from 17 drugstores in 7 countries were evaluated. Median price of sunscreen was $1.7 US per 10 grams. The price decreased with the size of the bottle. The median price for a family varied from $178.2 per week to $238.4 per week. The price decreased by 33% if the family wore UV-protective T-shirts and by 41% if large-volume bottles were used. The median price for a transplant patient varied from $245.3 per year to $292.3 per year. Limitations Anti-UVA activity and topical properties were not evaluated. We tested the recommended amount (2 mg/cm(2)) rather than the amount actually used (1 mg/cm(2)). Conclusion Under acute sun exposure conditions (a week at the beach), the cost of sun protection appears acceptable if sun protective clothin…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.06.043

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The inverse association between sunscreen use and household income suggests that cost may be a barrier to sunscreen use.

    “The inverse association between sunscreen use and household income suggests that cost may be a barrier to sunscreen use, a concern also raised by others.22, 26”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mahé, E., Beauchet, A., de Maleissye, M.-F., & Saiag, P.
Affiliations
Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (FR)
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-09
Volume
65
Issue
3
Pages
e73-e79
ISSN
0190-9622 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2111693682
Cited by
32
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Keywords
sun protection, skin cancer prevention, transplant recipients, sun-protective clothing, UV-protective clothing
MeSH terms
Europe, Humans, Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced, North America, Protective Clothing, Skin Neoplasms, Sunlight, Sunscreening Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review