Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 237

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A new American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Creation and rationale for inclusion of tumor (T) characteristics

Open access
Farasat, Sharifeh, Yu, Siegrid S., Neel, Victor A., Nehal, Kishwer S., Lardaro, Thomas, Mihm, Martin C., Byrd, David R., Balch, Charles M., Califano, Joseph A., Chuang, Alice Y., Sharfman, William H., Shah, Jatin P., Nghiem, Paul, Otley, Clark C., Tufaro, Anthony P., Johnson, Timothy M., Sober, Arthur J., Liégeois, Nanette J.·2011·Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

Abstract

Background The incidence of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is increasing. Although most patients achieve complete remission with surgical treatment, those with advanced disease have a poor prognosis. The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) is responsible for the staging criteria for all cancers. For the past 20 years, the AJCC cancer staging manual has grouped all nonmelanoma skin cancers, including cSCC, together for the purposes of staging. However, based on new evidence, the AJCC has determined that cSCC should have a separate staging system in the 7th edition AJCC staging manual. Objective We sought to present the rationale for and characteristics of the new AJCC staging system specific to cSCC tumor characteristics (T). Methods The Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Task Force of AJCC reviewed relevant data and reached expert consensus in creating the 7th edition AJCC staging system for cSCC. Emphasis was placed on prospectively accumulated data and multivariate analyses. Concordance with head and neck cancer staging system was also achieved. Results A new AJCC cSCC T classification is presented. The T classification is determined by tumor diameter, invasion into cranial bone, and high-risk features, including anatomic location, tumor thickness and level, differentiation, and perineural invasion. Limitations The data available for analysis are still suboptimal, with limited prospective outcomes trials and few multivariate analyses. Conclusions The new AJCC staging system for cSCC incorporates tumor-specific (T) staging features and will encourage coordinated, consistent collection of data that will be the basis of improved prognostic systems in the future.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.08.033

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 237

Metadata

Authors
Farasat, S., Yu, S. S., Neel, V. A., Nehal, K. S., Lardaro, T., Mihm, M. C., Byrd, D. R., Balch, C. M., Califano, J. A., Chuang, A. Y., Sharfman, W. H., Shah, J. P., Nghiem, P., Otley, C. C., Tufaro, A. P., Johnson, T. M., Sober, A. J., & Liégeois, N. J.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-06
Volume
64
Issue
6
Pages
1051-1059
ISSN
0190-9622 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018404789
Cited by
237
References
2
FWCI
17.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Creation and rationale for inclusion of tumor (T) characteristics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jaad.2010.08.033
The paper
Farasat, S., Yu, S. S., Neel, V. A., Nehal, K. S., Lardaro, T., Mihm, M. C., Byrd, D. R., Balch, C. M., Califano, J. A., Chuang, A. Y., Sharfman, W. H., Shah, J. P., Nghiem, P., Otley, C. C., Tufaro, A. P., Johnson, T. M., Sober, A. J., & Liégeois, N. J. (2011). A new American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Creation and rationale for inclusion of tumor (T) characteristics. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2010.08.033

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.