Smartphones, photography, and security in dermatology
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
60% of specialists continue to store photographs of their patients in their personal mobile phones.
“Although 60% of specialists continue to store photographs of their patients in their personal mobile phones [72,74-77]”
From Use of Smartphones for Early Detection of Melanoma: Systematic Review (2018) · cites this paper as [74]
Cites
Kunde, L., McMeniman, E., & Parker, M. (2013) · Australasian Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/ajd.12063 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Hubbard, V. G., Goddard, D., & Walker, S. L. (2009) · Clinical and Experimental Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2230.2008.03004.x · Cited by 21 · see citing works
The use of digital cameras by US dermatologists
Accetta, P., Accetta, J. L., & Kostecki, J. (2013) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2013.07.010 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Use of Smartphones for Early Detection of Melanoma: Systematic Review
Rat, C., Hild, S., Rault Sérandour, J., Gaultier, A., Quereux, G., Dreno, B., & Nguyen, J.-M. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.9392 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
“Although the abusive use of clinical photographs has become an increasing preoccupation of health fund organizations [73], only 30% of patients worry about the future of their photographs [74], and our review reported that only slightly more than half of the authors encrypted their data.”
Abbott, L. M., Magnusson, R. S., Gibbs, E., & Smith, S. D. (2018) · Australasian Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/ajd.12583 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
- Authors
- Anyanwu, C. O., & Lipoff, J. B.
- Affiliations
- Georgetown University (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- ORCID
- Lipoff, Jules B.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 193-195
- ISSN
- 0190-9622 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2058418322
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 3.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Digital Imaging in Medicine
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- medical photography, smartphone photography, dermatology, patient privacy, data security, patient consent, digital image storage, medicolegal issues, physician attitudes, dermatology residents, informed consent forms
- MeSH terms
- Dermatology, Humans, Photography, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Surveys and Questionnaires, Computer Security, Cell Phone
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
