Correspondence to Abdel Azim et al, “Sunscreens part 2: Regulation and safety”. Regulatory gaps in sunscreen approval: A comparison of U.S. and Korean UV filters
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Pantelic, M. N., Wong, N. A., Kwa, M. C., & Lim, H. W. (2022) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2022.11.039 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 2009, Council of the European Union. Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products, Off J Eur Union, L342, 59
- 1999, Sunscreen drug products for over-the-counter human use; final monograph, Fed Regist, 64, 27666
Cited by
Still being checked.
- Authors
- Pak, C., Nguyen, M., Asoudegi, D., & Tsoukas, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Chicago, Rockford campus (US)
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- Venue
- Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2026-11
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e445-e447
- ISSN
- 0190-9622 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7166190915
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Regulation
- Keywords
- sunscreen, UV filters, sunscreen regulation, legislative gaps, sunscreen safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
