Cited by 82Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalCarbon Dioxide Capture Technologies

Model for the physical activation of biochar to activated carbon

Colomba, Anastasia, Berruti, Franco, Briens, Cedric·2022·Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaap.2022.105769

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Colomba, A., Berruti, F., & Briens, C.
Affiliations
Western University (CA)
Venue
Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-11
Volume
168
Pages
105769
ISSN
0165-2370 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4307902469
Cited by
82
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 1
FWCI
4.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Biofuelnet Canada
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Keywords
biochar, activated carbon, physical activation, CO2 activation, steam activation, pyrolysis, olive pomace, pore structure, specific surface area, activation yield, heating rate, biomass conversion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review