Cited by 19Artificial Intelligence in HealthcareCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention

Improving Cardiovascular Disease Prediction With Machine Learning Using Mental Health Data

Open access
Dorraki, Mohsen, Liao, Zhibin, Abbott, Derek, Psaltis, Peter J., Baker, Emma, Bidargaddi, Niranjan, Wardill, Hannah R., van den Hengel, Anton +2 more·2024·JACC: Advances

Abstract

Background: Robust and accurate prediction of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk facilitates early intervention to benefit patients. The intricate relationship between mental health disorders and CVD is widely recognized. However, existing models often overlook psychological factors, relying on a limited set of clinical and lifestyle parameters, or being developed on restricted population subsets. Objectives: This study aims to assess the impact of integrating psychological data into a novel machine learning (ML) approach on enhancing CVD prediction performance. Methods: Using a comprehensive UK Biobank data set (n = 375,145), the correlation between CVD and traditional and psychological risk factors was examined. CVD included hypertensive disease, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, and arrhythmias. An ensemble ML model containing 5 constituent algorithms (decision tree, random forest, XGBoost, support vector machine, and deep neural network) was tested for its ability to predict CVD based on 2 training data sets: using traditional CVD risk factors alone, or using a combination of traditional and psychological risk factors. Results: A total of 375,145 subjects with normal health status and with CVD were included. The ensemble ML model could predict CVD with 71.31% accuracy using traditional CVD risk factors alone. However, by adding psychological factors to the training data, accuracy increased to 85.13%. The accuracy and robustness of the ensemble ML model outperformed all 5 constituent learning algorithms. Conclusions: Incorporating mental health assessment data within an ensemble ML model results in a significantly improved, highly accurate, CVD prediction model, outperforming traditional risk factor prediction alone.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101180

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • UK Biobank has facilitated the development of ensemble machine learning models that achieve remarkable accuracy improvements by incorporating psychological factors alongside traditional risk parameters for cardiovascular disease prediction.

    “CVD prediction has similarly benefited from these robust datasets, with UK Biobank facilitating the development of ensemble machine learning models that achieve remarkable accuracy improvements by incorporating psychological factors alongside traditional risk parameters (64).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. [1]Task F.M. Piepoli M. Hoes A. 2016 European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: the Sixth joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and other Societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts) developed with the special contribution of the European association for cardiovascular prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR) Atherosclerosis 252 2016 207 27664503
  2. [2]Casto G. Mastropieri M.A. The efficacy of early intervention programs: a meta-analysis Except Child 52 1986 417 424 2936605
  3. [3]Ridker P.M. Buring J.E. Rifai N. Cook N.R. Development and validation of improved algorithms for the assessment of global cardiovascular risk in women: the Reynolds Risk Score JAMA 297 2007 611 619 17299196
  4. [4]Wang T.J. Gona P. Larson M.G. Multiple biomarkers for the prediction of first major cardiovascular events and death N Engl J Med 355 2006 2631 2639 17182988
  5. [5]Conroy R.M. Pyörälä K. Fitzgerald A.P. Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project Eur Heart J 24 2003 987 1003 12788299
  6. [6]Hippisley-Cox J. Coupland C. Vinogradova Y. Robson J. May M. Brindle P. Derivation and validation of QRISK, a new cardiovascular disease risk score for the United Kingdom: prospective open cohort study BMJ 335 2007 136 17615182 PMC1925200
  7. [7]Hippisley-Cox J. Coupland C. Vinogradova Y. Robson J. Brindle P. Performance of the QRISK cardiovascular risk prediction algorithm in an independent UK sample of patients from general practice: a validation study Heart 94 2008 34 39 17916661
  8. [8]Altman D.G. Royston P. What do we mean by validating a prognostic model? Stat Med 19 2000 453 473 10694730
  9. [9]Goff D. Lloyd-Jones D. Bennett G. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American heart association Task Force on practice guidelines Circulation 63 2014 S49 S73 24222018
  10. [10]Whelton P.K. Carey R.M. Aronow W.S. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines J Am Coll Cardiol 71 2018 e127 e248 29146535
  11. [11]Wilson P.W. D’Agostino R.B. Levy D. Belanger A.M. Silbershatz H. Kannel W.B. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories Circulation 97 1998 1837 1847 9603539
  12. [12]Rutledge T. Linke S.E. Krantz D.S. Comorbid depression and anxiety symptoms as predictors of cardiovascular events: results from the NHLBI-sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study Psychosom Med 71 2009 958 19834049 PMC2783707
  13. [14]Jiang W. Babyak M. Krantz D.S. Mental stress—induced myocardial ischemia and cardiac events JAMA 275 1996 1651 1656 8637138
  14. [15]Bosma H. Peter R. Siegrist J. Marmot M. Two alternative job stress models and the risk of coronary heart disease Am J Public Health 88 1998 68 74 9584036 PMC1508386
  15. [16]Sheps D.S. McMahon R.P. Becker L. Mental stress–induced ischemia and all-cause mortality in patients with coronary artery disease: results from the Psychophysiological Investigations of Myocardial Ischemia study Circulation 105 2002 1780 1784 11956119
  16. [17]Sharkey S.W. Lesser J.R. Zenovich A.G. Acute and reversible cardiomyopathy provoked by stress in women from the United States Circulation 111 2005 472 479 15687136
  17. [18]Lampert R. Jain D. Burg M.M. Batsford W.P. McPherson C.A. Destabilizing effects of mental stress on ventricular arrhythmias in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators Circulation 101 2000 158 164 10637203
  18. [21]Ford D.E. Mead L.A. Chang P.P. Cooper-Patrick L. Wang N.-Y. Klag M.J. Depression is a risk factor for coronary artery disease in men: the precursors study Arch Intern Med 158 1998 1422 1426 9665350
  19. [22]York K.M. Hassan M. Li Q. Li H. Fillingim R.B. Sheps D.S. Coronary artery disease and depression: patients with more depressive symptoms have lower cardiovascular reactivity during laboratory-induced mental stress Psychosom Med 69 2007 521 528 17636149
  20. [24]Pratt L.A. Ford D.E. Crum R.M. Armenian H.K. Gallo J.J. Eaton W.W. Depression, psychotropic medication, and risk of myocardial infarction: prospective data from the Baltimore ECA follow-up Circulation 94 1996 3123 3129 8989119
  21. [25]Rottenberg J. Clift A. Bolden S. Salomon K. RSA fluctuation in major depressive disorder Psychophysiology 44 2007 450 458 17371497
  22. [26]Compare A. Germani E. Proietti R. Janeway D. Clinical psychology and cardiovascular disease: an up-to-date clinical practice review for assessment and treatment of anxiety and depression Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health 7 2011 148 22016750 PMC3195800
  23. [27]Janszky I. Ahnve S. Lundberg I. Hemmingsson T. Early-onset depression, anxiety, and risk of subsequent coronary heart disease: 37-year follow-up of 49,321 young Swedish men J Am Coll Cardiol 56 2010 31 37 20620714
  24. [28]Zafar M.U. Paz-Yepes M. Shimbo D. Anxiety is a better predictor of platelet reactivity in coronary artery disease patients than depression Eur Heart J 31 2010 1573 1582 20097703 PMC2895160
  25. [29]Michal M. Beutel M. Mental disorders and cardiovascular disease: what should we be looking out for? Heart 107 2021 1756 1761 33509980
  26. [30]Gaffey A.E. Harris K.M. Mena-Hurtado C. Sinha R. Jacoby D.L. Smolderen K.G. The Yale Roadmap for health psychology and integrated cardiovascular care Health Psychol 41 2022 779 791 35201804
  27. [31]Sudlow C. Gallacher J. Allen N. UK biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age PLoS Med 12 2015 e1001779 PMC4380465 25826379
  28. [32]Safavian S.R. Landgrebe D. A Survey of Decision Tree Classifier Methodology 21 1991 IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 660 674
  29. [33]Ho T.K. Random decision forests Proceedings of 3rd international conference on document analysis and recognition 1995 IEEE 278 282
  30. [36]Schmidhuber J. Deep learning in neural networks: an overview Neural Network 61 2015 85 117 25462637
  31. [38]Harris C.R. Millman K.J. Van Der Walt S.J. Array programming with NumPy Nature 585 2020 357 362 32939066 PMC7759461
  32. [39]Virtanen P. Gommers R. Oliphant T.E. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python Nat Methods 17 2020 261 272 32015543 PMC7056644
  33. [43]Van Rossum G. Python Programming Language 2007 USENIX annual technical conference 1 36
  34. [44]Cunningham R. Poppe K. Peterson D. Every-Palmer S. Soosay I. Jackson R. Prediction of cardiovascular disease risk among people with severe mental illness: a cohort study PLoS One 14 2019 e0221521 PMC6750572 31532772
  35. [45]Fisher S.H. Psychological factors and heart disease Circulation 27 1963 113 117 13945297

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dorraki, M., Liao, Z., Abbott, D., Psaltis, P. J., Baker, E., Bidargaddi, N., Wardill, H. R., van den Hengel, A., Narula, J., & Verjans, J. W.
Affiliations
  • South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (AU)
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
  • Flinders University (AU)
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Corresponding author
Verjans, Johan W.
Venue
JACC: Advances
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-09
Volume
3
Issue
9
Pages
101180
ISSN
2772-963X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402831175
Cited by
19
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 1
FWCI
5.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JACC Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Keywords
cardiovascular disease prediction, mental health, psychological risk factors, ensemble learning, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, cardiac arrhythmias, UK Biobank, cardiovascular risk factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review