Cited by 49Pharmaceutical industry and healthcarePharmaceutical studies and practicesBiomedical Ethics and Regulation

Off-Label Use vs Off-Label Marketing of Drugs

Open access
Van Norman, Gail A.·2023·JACC: Basic to Translational Science

Abstract

Once medical drugs and devices are approved for marketing by the FDA they can legally be used for purposes and in ways other than the ones for which they have been tested and approved. However, it is illegal for manufacturers to advertise or promote such unapproved uses of the drugs and devices. Part 1 of this review focuses on off-label use of FDA-approved therapies. Part 2 addresses illegal off-label marketing of drugs and devices. While off-label use can be beneficial to patients, unless carefully undertaken off label use may undermine the important safety mission of the FDA, can expose patients to elevated risks without proven benefits (or possibly no benefit), and can reduce motivation of companies to study the safety and risks of off-label use of therapies. These problems are further amplified when off-label use occurs among very vulnerable patient populations such as the elderly, patients with mental health disorders, pregnant women and pediatric patients. This review considers ethical issues in off-label use, as well as important steps for physicians considering an off-label prescription of a drug or device.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacbts.2022.12.011

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the United States, the FDA approves medicines only for specific indications, but physicians are allowed to prescribe them off-label when supported by scientific evidence; commercial promotion of off-label uses by pharmaceutical companies is prohibited.

    “Regulatory strategies also differ in the United States; the FDA approves medicines only for specific indications, but physicians are allowed to prescribe them off-label when supported by scientific evidence. The main restriction is the prohibition of commercial promotion of off-label uses by pharmaceutical companies.3”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [59]American Medical Association (AMA) Report 4 of the Council on Science and Public Health: hormone therapies: off-label uses and unapproved formulations. Executive Summary. CSAPH Report 4-I-16. 2016 https://www.ama-assn.org/sites/ama-assn.org/files/corp/media-browser/2016-interim-csaph-report-4.pdf#:∼:text=Current%20AMA%20Policy%20H-120.988%2C%20“Patient%20Access%20to%20Treatments,and%20dissemination%20of%20medical%20information%20in%20the%20media

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Norman, G. A.
Venue
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-02
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
224-233
ISSN
2452-302X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4322489596
Cited by
49
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 1
FWCI
12.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JACC Basic to Translational Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Keywords
off-label drug use, FDA drug approval, drug safety, vulnerable patients, physician prescribing decisions, drug promotion regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review