Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,026

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Multislice Computed Tomographic Characteristics of Coronary Lesions in Acute Coronary Syndromes

Open access
Motoyama, Sadako, Kondo, Takeshi, Sarai, Masayoshi, Sugiura, Atsushi, Harigaya, Hiroto, Sato, Takahisa, Inoue, Kaori, Okumura, Masanori, Ishii, Junichi, Anno, Hirofumi, Virmani, Renu, Ozaki, Yukio, Hishida, Hitoshi, Narula, Jagat·2007·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the feasibility of noninvasive assessment of the characteristics of disrupted atherosclerotic plaques, the authors interrogated the culprit lesions in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) by multislice computed tomography (CT). BACKGROUND Disrupted atherosclerotic plaques responsible for ACS histopathologically demonstrate large lipid cores and positive vascular remodeling. It is expected that plaques vulnerable to rupture should bear similar imaging signatures by CT. METHODS Either 0.5-mm x 16-slice or 64-slice CT was performed in 38 patients with ACS and compared with 33 patients with stable angina pectoris (SAP) before percutaneous coronary intervention. The coronary plaques in ACS and SAP were evaluated for the CT plaque characteristics, including vessel remodeling, consistency of noncalcified plaque (NCP <30 HU or 30 HU <NCP <150 HU), and spotty or large calcification. RESULTS In the CT profile of culprit ACS and SAP lesions, the frequency of 30 HU <NCP <150 HU (100% vs. 100%, p = NS) was not different, and large calcification (22% vs. 55%, p = 0.004) was significantly more frequent in the stable lesions. Positive remodeling (87% vs. 12%, p < 0.0001), NCP <30 HU (79% vs. 9%, p < 0.0001), and spotty calcification (63% vs. 21%, p = 0.0005) were significantly more frequent in the ACS lesions. Presence of all 3 (i.e., positive remodeling, NCP <30 HU, and spotty calcification) showed a high positive predictive value, and absence of all 3 showed a high negative predictive value for the culprit plaques associated with ACS. CONCLUSIONS The CT characteristics of plaques associated with ACS include positive vascular remodeling, low plaque density, and spotty calcification. It is logical to presume that plaques vulnerable to rupture harbor similar characteristics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.044

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,026

Metadata

Authors
Motoyama, S., Kondo, T., Sarai, M., Sugiura, A., Harigaya, H., Sato, T., Inoue, K., Okumura, M., Ishii, J., Anno, H., Virmani, R., Ozaki, Y., Hishida, H., & Narula, J.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-07
Volume
50
Issue
4
Pages
319-326
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018637416
Cited by
1,026
References
0
FWCI
36.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multislice Computed Tomographic Characteristics of Coronary Lesions in Acute Coronary Syndromes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.044
The paper
Motoyama, S., Kondo, T., Sarai, M., Sugiura, A., Harigaya, H., Sato, T., Inoue, K., Okumura, M., Ishii, J., Anno, H., Virmani, R., Ozaki, Y., Hishida, H., & Narula, J. (2007). Multislice Computed Tomographic Characteristics of Coronary Lesions in Acute Coronary Syndromes. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.044

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.