Cited by 362Cardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsCoronary Interventions and DiagnosticsCoronary Artery Anomalies

Coronary Atherosclerosis Imaging by Coronary CT Angiography

Open access
Voros, Szilard, Rinehart, Sarah, Qian, Zhen, Joshi, Parag, Vazquez, Gustavo, Fischer, Collin, Belur, Pallavi, Hulten, Edward +1 more·2011·JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging

Abstract

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) allows coronary artery visualization and the detection of coronary stenoses. In addition; it has been suggested as a novel, noninvasive modality for coronary atherosclerotic plaque detection, characterization, and quantification. Emerging data show that coronary CTA-based semiquantitative plaque characterization and quantification are sufficiently reproducible for clinical purposes, and fully quantitative approaches may be appropriate for use in clinical trials. Furthermore, several lines of investigation have validated plaque imaging by coronary CTA against other imaging modalities such as intravascular ultrasound/"virtual histology" and optical coherence tomography, and there are emerging data using biochemical modalities such as near-infrared spectroscopy. Finally, clinical validation in patients with acute coronary syndrome and in the outpatient setting has shown incremental value of CTA-based plaque characterization for the prediction of major cardiovascular events. With recent developments in image acquisition and reconstruction technologies, coronary CTA can be performed with relatively low radiation exposure. With further technological innovation and clinical research, coronary CTA may become an important tool in the quest to identify vulnerable plaques and the at-risk patient.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.03.006

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent developments in contrast-enhanced coronary CT angiography allow detection of positive remodelling, increased plaque volumes and lipoprotein deposition in non-calcified plaques.

    “Recent developments in contrast-enhanced coronary CT angiography allow the detection of positive remodelling, increased plaque volumes and lipoprotein deposition in non-calcified plaques124.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Raff GL, Abidov A, Achenbach S, et al. SCCT guidelines for the interpre- tation and reporting of coronary com- puted tomography angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009; 3:122-36.
  2. Hoffmann U, Moselewski F, Nieman K, et al. Noninvasive assessment of plaque morphology and composition in culprit and stable lesions in acute coronary syndrome and stable lesions in stable angina by multidetector com- puted tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1655-62.
  3. Min JK, Shaw LJ, Devereux RB, et al. Prognostic value of multidetector cor- onary computed tomographic angiog- raphy for prediction of all-cause mor- tality. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50: 1161-70.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Voros, S., Rinehart, S., Qian, Z., Joshi, P., Vazquez, G., Fischer, C., Belur, P., Hulten, E., & Villines, T. C.
Affiliations
  • Piedmont Atlanta Hospital (US)
  • Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (US)
Venue
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-05
Volume
4
Issue
5
Pages
537-548
ISSN
  • 1876-7591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-878X
OpenAlex
W113768872
Cited by
362
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 25
FWCI
5.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JACC. Cardiovascular imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Abbott Vascular
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Coronary Artery Anomalies
Keywords
coronary CT angiography, coronary artery disease, coronary plaque, plaque characterization, plaque quantification, vulnerable plaque, coronary artery stenosis, acute coronary syndrome, cardiovascular event prediction, intravascular ultrasound, virtual histology, optical coherence tomography, near-infrared spectroscopy, radiation exposure
MeSH terms
Calcinosis, Coronary Artery Disease, Humans, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Severity of Illness Index, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Reproducibility of Results, Observer Variation, Coronary Angiography, Ultrasonography, Interventional, Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared, Coronary Stenosis, Tomography, Optical Coherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review