Cited by 73Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesCardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Barriers to Conversations About Deactivation of Implantable Defibrillators in Seriously Ill Patients

Open access
Goldstein, Nathan, Bradley, Elizabeth, Zeidman, Jessica, Mehta, Davendra, Morrison, R. Sean·2009·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.030

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Few patients or families discuss the option of device deactivation with their physicians before the days preceding death, even among patients with do-not-resuscitate orders or during terminal situations.

    “yet few patients or families discuss the option of device deactivation with their physicians before the days preceding death, even among patients with do-notresuscitate orders, or during terminal situations.”

    From Managing with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (2013) · cites this paper as [44]

    The discussion identifies physician perceptions that may discourage conversations about ICD deactivation in advanced illness. It does not report how few patients or families have these conversations, when they occur relative to death, or whether they occur for patients with do-not-resuscitate orders or in terminal situations. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Many patients do not know that device deactivation is an available option.

    “Many do not know that device deactivation is an available option.33,44,45”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldstein, N., Bradley, E., Zeidman, J., Mehta, D., & Morrison, R. S.
Affiliations
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Corresponding author
Goldstein, Nathan
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-07
Volume
54
Issue
4
Pages
371-373
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1605449461
Cited by
73
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 11
FWCI
10.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Patrick and Catherine Weldon Donaghue Medical Research Foundation
  • Hartford Foundation for Public Giving
  • Boston Scientific Corporation
  • National Palliative Care Research Center
  • National Institutes of Health (2p30ag028741-16)
  • National Institute on Aging (P30‐AG028741, K23AG025933, K24AG022345, 1K24 AG 22345‐01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, device deactivation, seriously ill patients, end-of-life care, physician-family communication, patient and family decision-making, multidisciplinary care
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Cardiology, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Male, Physicians, Family, Surveys and Questionnaires, Terminal Care, Defibrillators, Implantable, Withholding Treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review