Cited by 174Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthCoronary Interventions and DiagnosticsCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

Clinical Predictors of Plaque Progression Despite Very Low Levels of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

Open access
Bayturan, Ozgur, Kapadia, Samir, Nicholls, Stephen J., Tuzcu, E. Murat, Shao, Mingyuan, Uno, Kiyoko, Shreevatsa, Ajai, Lavoie, Andrea J. +3 more·2010·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives The purpose of this study was to characterize the determinants of plaque progression despite achieving very low levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C).Background Despite achieving very low levels of LDL-C, many patients continue to demonstrate disease progression and have clinical events.Methods A total of 3,437 patients with coronary artery disease underwent serial intravascular ultrasound examination in 7 clinical trials. Patients who achieved an on-treatment LDL-C level of <or=70 mg/dl (n = 951) were stratified as progressors (n = 200) and nonprogressors (n = 751) and compared.Results Despite achieving LDL-C <or=70 mg/dl, >20% of patients continued to progress. There were no demographic differences between groups. Progressors demonstrated higher baseline levels of glucose (117.1 +/- 42.5 mg/dl vs. 112.1 +/- 40.0 mg/dl, p = 0.02), triglycerides (157.5 mg/dl vs. 133.0 mg/dl, p = 0.004), and a smaller decrease of apolipoprotein B (-25.1 +/- 3.4 mg/dl vs. -27.4 +/- 3.35 mg/dl, p = 0.01) at follow-up. Multivariable analysis revealed that independently associated risk factors of progression in patients with LDL-C <or=70 mg/dl included baseline percent atheroma volume (p = 0.001), presence of diabetes mellitus (p = 0.02), increase in systolic blood pressure (p = 0.001), less increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p = 0.01), and a smaller decrease in apolipoprotein B levels (p = 0.001), but not changes in C-reactive protein (p = 0.78) or LDL-C (p = 0.84).Conclusions Residual risk factors are associated with the likelihood of disease progression in patients who achieve very low LDL-C levels. In addition, the association between apolipoprotein B and atheroma progression highlights the potential importance of LDL particle concentration in patients with optimal LDL-C control. This finding highlights the need for intensive modification of global risk in patients with coronary artery disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.01.050

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bayturan, O., Kapadia, S., Nicholls, S. J., Tuzcu, E. M., Shao, M., Uno, K., Shreevatsa, A., Lavoie, A. J., Wolski, K., Schoenhagen, P., & Nissen, S. E.
Affiliations
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
Corresponding author
Nicholls, Stephen J.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-06
Volume
55
Issue
24
Pages
2736-2742
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080152964
Cited by
174
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 11
FWCI
15.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Keywords
coronary artery disease, atheroma progression, very low LDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, residual cardiovascular risk, diabetes mellitus, systolic blood pressure, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, intravascular ultrasound, atheroma volume, C-reactive protein
MeSH terms
Coronary Disease, Coronary Vessels, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Ultrasonography, Interventional, Disease Progression, Atherosclerosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review