Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 729

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Global Cardiovascular Reserve Dysfunction in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Open access
Borlaug, Barry A., Olson, Thomas P., Lam, Carolyn S.P., Flood, Kelly S., Lerman, Amir, Johnson, Bruce D., Redfield, Margaret M.·2010·Journal of the American College of Cardiology
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.077
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objectives To comprehensively examine cardiovascular reserve function with exercise in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Background Optimal exercise performance requires an integrated physiologic response, with coordinated increases in heart rate, contractility, lusitropy, arterial vasodilatation, endothelial function and venous return. Cardiac and vascular responses are coupled, and abnormalities in several components may interact to promote exertional intolerance in HFpEF. Methods Subjects with HFpEF (n=21), hypertension without heart failure (n=19) and no cardiovascular disease (control, n=10) were studied before and during exercise with characterization of cardiovascular reserve function by Doppler echocardiography, peripheral arterial tonometry and gas exchange. Results Exercise capacity and tolerance were reduced in HFpEF compared with hypertensives and controls, with lower VO2 and cardiac index at peak, and more severe dyspnea and fatigue at matched low-level workloads. Endothelial function was impaired in HFpEF and in hypertensives as compared with controls. However, blunted exercise-induced increases in chronotropy, contractility and vasodilation were unique to HFpEF and resulted in impaired dynamic ventricular-arterial coupling responses during exercise. Exercise capacity and symptoms of exertional intolerance were correlated with abnormalities in each component of cardiovascular reserve function, and HFpEF subjects were more likely to display multiple abnormalities in reserve. Conclusion HFpEF is characterized by depressed reserve capacity involving multiple domains of cardiovascular function, which contribute in an integrated fashion to produce exercise limitation. Appreciation of the global nature of reserve dysfunction in HFpEF will better inform optimal design for future diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.077

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Cited by

See all 729

Metadata

Authors
Borlaug, B. A., Olson, T. P., Lam, C. S. P., Flood, K. S., Lerman, A., Johnson, B. D., & Redfield, M. M.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-09
Volume
56
Issue
11
Pages
845-854
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.077
OpenAlex
W1991875014
Cited by
729
References
34
FWCI
84.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global Cardiovascular Reserve Dysfunction in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.077
The paper
Borlaug, B. A., Olson, T. P., Lam, C. S. P., Flood, K. S., Lerman, A., Johnson, B. D., & Redfield, M. M. (2010). Global Cardiovascular Reserve Dysfunction in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.077

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.