Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 486

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparative influence of load versus inotropic states on indexes of ventricular contractility: experimental and theoretical analysis based on pressure-volume relationships.

Open access
Kass, D A, Maughan, W L, Guo, Z M, Kono, A, Sunagawa, K, Sagawa, K·1987·Circulation

Abstract

We examined the quantitative influence of carefully controlled alterations in end-diastolic volume and afterload resistance on multiple simultaneously determined ejection and isovolumetric phase indexes of left ventricular contractile function in 23 isolated supported canine ventricles. The influence of load change on each index was compared with its sensitivity to inotropic stimulation, and this sensitivity was in turn contrasted to the response of the end-systolic pressure-volume relationship (ESPVR). Experimental data demonstrated various degrees of load sensitivity among the indexes, with a generally curvilinear relationship between load and index response for both preload and afterload alterations. The curvilinear nature of these relationships meant that over a select range of loading, many indexes demonstrated relative load independence. They also often displayed greater sensitivity to inotropic change than the ESPVR, and both factors help explain their enduring clinical utility. To further explore the influence of load and contractile state on several of the indexes, we developed a theoretical analysis, using variables common to pressure-volume relationships, in which these dependencies could be derived. The theoretical models fit very well with the experimental data, and reaffirmed the frequently curvilinear nature of the relationships. We conclude that while many clinical indexes of ventricular contractile function show significant load dependence, the information they provide can be reasonably interpreted within defined ranges of load and inotropic alteration. Any advantage of the ESPVR will derive not from the magnitude of its response to inotropic change, which is smaller than most other indexes, but from its relative insensitivity to load alteration over a wider range of load.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.76.6.1422

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 486

Metadata

Authors
Kass, D. A., Maughan, W. L., Guo, Z. M., Kono, A., Sunagawa, K., & Sagawa, K.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1987-12
Volume
76
Issue
6
Pages
1422-1436
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W1562799989
Cited by
486
References
0
FWCI
9.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative influence of load versus inotropic states on indexes of ventricular contractility: experimental and theoretical analysis based on pressure-volume relationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.76.6.1422
The paper
Kass, D. A., Maughan, W. L., Guo, Z. M., Kono, A., Sunagawa, K., & Sagawa, K. (1987). Comparative influence of load versus inotropic states on indexes of ventricular contractility: experimental and theoretical analysis based on pressure-volume relationships. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.76.6.1422

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.