Cited by 136Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesECG Monitoring and AnalysisCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ambulatory External Electrocardiographic Monitoring

Open access
Mittal, Suneet, Movsowitz, Colin, Steinberg, Jonathan S.·2011·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

There has been progressive development in ambulatory external electrocardiogram (AECG) monitoring technology. AECG monitors initially consisted of 24- to 48-h Holter monitors and patient-activated event and loop recorders. More recently, several ambulatory cardiovascular telemetry monitors and a patch-type 7- to 14-day Holter monitor have been introduced. These monitoring systems are reviewed along with their utility and limitations, with particular emphasis on their role in the diagnosis and evaluation of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). AECG monitoring is necessary when asymptomatic AF is suspected (as in patients presenting with cryptogenic stroke) or when an ECG diagnosis of unexplained arrhythmic symptoms is warranted. In addition, AECG plays an important role in patients with known AF to guide ventricular rate control and anticoagulation therapy, and assess the efficacy of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and/or ablation procedures. Finally, we outline areas of uncertainty and provide recommendations for use of available AECG monitors in clinical practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.07.026

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Khan, 2011, Pulmonary vein isolation alone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 22, 142

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mittal, S., Movsowitz, C., & Steinberg, J. S.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Lankenau Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Mittal, Suneet
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-10
Volume
58
Issue
17
Pages
1741-1749
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W31310327
Cited by
136
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Keywords
Holter monitoring, event data recorders, loop recorder, atrial fibrillation, cryptogenic stroke, ventricular rate control, anticoagulation, antiarrhythmic efficacy, catheter ablation
MeSH terms
Atrial Fibrillation, Humans, Telemetry, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review