Cited by 84Coronary Interventions and DiagnosticsCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsAcute Myocardial Infarction Research

Silent Ischemia

Open access
Conti, C. Richard, Bavry, Anthony A., Petersen, John W.·2012·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Myocardial ischemia can occur without overt symptoms. In fact, asymptomatic (or silent) ST-segment depression during ambulatory electrocardiogram monitoring occurs more often than symptomatic ST-segment depression in patients with coronary artery disease. Initial studies documented that silent ischemia provided independent prediction of adverse outcomes in patients with known and unknown coronary artery disease. The ACIP (Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot Study) enrolled patients in the 1990s and found that revascularization was better than medical therapy in reducing silent ischemic episodes and possibly cardiovascular (CV) events. However, the more recent COURAGE (Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation) trial found similar CV event rates between patients treated with optimal medical therapy alone and those treated with optimal medical therapy plus percutaneous revascularization. Therefore, in the current era, medical therapy appears to be as effective as revascularization in suppressing symptomatic ischemia and preventing CV events. COURAGE was not designed to evaluate changes in the frequency of silent ischemia. Therefore, silent ischemia may persist despite current-era treatment and might still identify patients with increased risk of CV events. Also, silent ischemia is likely to occur frequently in heart transplant patients with denervated hearts and coronary allograft vasculopathy, and future study aimed at improving the management of silent ischemia in this population is warranted. Additionally, future research is warranted to study the effect of newer medical therapies such as ranolazine or selected use of revascularization (for example, guided by fractional flow reserve) in those patients with persistent silent ischemia despite optimal current-era medical therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.07.050

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For a diagnosis of ischemia, ST-segment depression of at least 0.5-1.0 mV (0.5-1.0 mm) lasting for at least 1 min before returning to normal should be seen.

    “For a diagnosis of ischemia, ST-segment depression of at least 0.5-1.0 mV (0.5-1.0 mm) lasting for at least 1 min before returning to normal should be seen (Conti, Bavry, & Petersen, 2012).”

    From 2017 ISHNE-HRS expert consensus statement on ambulatory ECG and external cardiac monitoring/telemetry (2017) · cites this paper as Conti, Bavry, & Petersen, 2012

    In “Definition, Diagnosis, and Mechanism,” the paper gives an example criterion for diagnosing silent ischemia during ambulatory ECG monitoring: ST-segment depression of at least 0.5 mV lasting at least 60 seconds and returning to normal. The citing sentence matches the duration and reversal, but presents the criterion as applying to ischemia generally, adds an unsupported 1.0 mV value, and incorrectly equates 0.5–1.0 mV with 0.5–1.0 mm. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [7]7. Stone PH. ST-segment analysis in ambulatory ECG (AECG or Holter) monitoring in patients with coronary artery disease: clinical significance and analytic techniques. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2005;10:263-78.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Conti, C. R., Bavry, A. A., & Petersen, J. W.
Affiliations
University of Florida Health (US)
Corresponding author
Petersen, John W.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
59
Issue
5
Pages
435-441
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3242620
Cited by
84
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Keywords
silent myocardial ischemia, coronary artery disease, COURAGE trial, percutaneous coronary intervention, optimal medical therapy, cardiovascular events, heart transplant recipients, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, denervation, ranolazine, fractional flow reserve
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Agents, Diagnosis, Differential, Exercise Test, Humans, Myocardial Revascularization, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory, Myocardial Ischemia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review