Cited by 157Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac Fibrosis and RemodelingCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

Diffuse Ventricular Fibrosis in Atrial Fibrillation

Open access
Ling, Liang-han, Kistler, Peter M., Ellims, Andris H., Iles, Leah M., Lee, Geraldine, Hughes, Gerard L., Kalman, Jonathan M., Kaye, David M. +1 more·2012·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate diffuse myocardial fibrosis of the left ventricle (LV) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).Background Diffuse myocardial fibrosis is a hallmark of cardiomyopathy. Unlike replacement fibrosis, it is not visualized on delayed-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, but may be quantified with contrast-enhanced T(1) mapping methods. In atrial fibrillation (AF), it may be induced by arrhythmia or reflect pre-existing cardiomyopathy.Methods Ninety subjects underwent CMR using a clinical 1.5-T scanner: 23 controls, 40 paroxysmal AF patients, and 27 persistent AF patients. Cardiac morphology and function was evaluated from CMR cine imaging. A histologically validated T(1) mapping sequence was used to calculate post-contrast T(1) relaxation time (T(1) time) of the LV myocardium as an index of diffuse myocardial fibrosis.Results Age was similar across controls, paroxysmal AF patients, and persistent AF patients (54 ± 12 years, 58 ± 9 years, and 56 ± 10 years, p = NS). Persistent AF patients had larger indexed left atrium volume (55 ± 18 ml vs. 41 ± 12 ml and 47 ± 14 ml) and lower ejection fraction (54 ± 10% vs. 65 ± 6% and 61 ± 8%) than controls and paroxysmal AF patients (p < 0.05). Post-contrast ventricular T(1) time differed across all groups (controls, 535 ± 86 ms; paroxysmal AF, 427 ± 95 ms; persistent AF, 360 ± 84 ms; p < 0.001). Univariate predictors of post-contrast ventricular T(1) time included age, sex, AF category, ejection fraction, LV mass, congestive heart failure, and body mass index. After multivariate analysis, age, AF category, and ejection fraction remained independent predictors.Conclusions Post-contrast ventricular T(1) mapping identifies diffuse LV fibrosis in patients with AF and provides new insights into the association between AF and adverse ventricular remodeling.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.065

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Delayed-enhancement MRI of the left atrium using gadolinium contrast, T1 mapping using cardiac MRI, and intracardiac echo may help to guide treatment decisions in AF, but require external validation in multicentre studies.

    “Delayed-enhancement MRI of the left atrium using gadolinium contrast, [345][346][347] T1 mapping using cardiac MRI, 347 and intracardiac echo 348 may help to guide treatment decisions in AF, but require external validation in multicentre studies.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. John BT, Tamarappoo BK, Titus JL, et al. Global remodeling of the ventricular interstitium in idiopathic myocardial fibrosis and sudden cardiac death. Heart Rhythm 2004;1:141-9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ling, L.-H., Kistler, P. M., Ellims, A. H., Iles, L. M., Lee, G., Hughes, G. L., Kalman, J. M., Kaye, D. M., & Taylor, A. J.
Affiliations
  • The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
  • Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute (AU)
Corresponding author
Taylor, Andrew J.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-12
Volume
60
Issue
23
Pages
2402-2408
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W184145030
Cited by
157
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 1
FWCI
9.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NHMRC
  • NHF
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, diffuse myocardial fibrosis, left ventricular fibrosis, T1 mapping, ventricular remodeling, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, persistent atrial fibrillation, left atrial volume, ejection fraction, cardiac magnetic resonance
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Atrial Fibrillation, Female, Fibrosis, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Cardiomyopathies, Myocardium, Retrospective Studies, Systole, Disease Progression, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review