Cited by 664Peripheral Artery Disease ManagementVascular Procedures and ComplicationsClinical practice guidelines implementation

Management of Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease (Compilation of 2005 and 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline Recommendations)

Open access
Anderson, Jeffrey L., Halperin, Jonathan L., Albert, Nancy, Bozkurt, Biykem, Brindis, Ralph G., Curtis, Lesley H., DeMets, David, Guyton, Robert A. +6 more·2013·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.01.004

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Despite several clinical guidelines mentioning vasodilator therapy for NOMI, only a few small studies have been published.

    “Despite several clinical guidelines mentioning vasodilator therapy for NOMI [133–135], only a few small studies have been published [136, 137].”

    From Acute mesenteric ischemia: updated guidelines of the World Society of Emergency Surgery. (2022) · cites this paper as [134]

    The cited guideline covers acute nonocclusive intestinal ischemia, but its treatment recommendations in §4.1.2.3 mention treating shock and resecting nonviable bowel, not vasodilator therapy. I searched for NOMI, nonocclusive intestinal ischemia, vasodilators, and papaverine; our copy does not establish that this guideline mentions vasodilator therapy for NOMI. The separate claim about small studies is attributed to other citations. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderson, J. L., Halperin, J. L., Albert, N., Bozkurt, B., Brindis, R. G., Curtis, L. H., DeMets, D., Guyton, R. A., Hochman, J. S., Kovacs, R. J., Ohman, E. M., Pressler, S. J., Sellke, F. W., & Shen, W.-K.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
61
Issue
14
Pages
1555-1570
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019734515
Cited by
664
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 85 · 2015: 93 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 3
FWCI
83.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL098967)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Peripheral Artery Disease Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Vascular Procedures and Complications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
peripheral arterial disease, guideline recommendations, clinical management
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Quality Assurance, Health Care, United States, Guideline Adherence, Peripheral Arterial Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review