Cited by 569Cardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsAortic Disease and Treatment ApproachesCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Complex Nature of Discordant Severe Calcified Aortic Valve Disease Grading

Open access
Clavel, Marie-Annick, Messika-Zeitoun, David, Pibarot, Philippe, Aggarwal, Shivani R., Malouf, Joseph, Araoz, Phillip A., Michelena, Hector I., Cueff, Caroline, Larose, Eric, Capoulade, Romain, Vahanian, Alec, Enriquez-Sarano, Maurice·2013·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives With concomitant Doppler echocardiography and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) measuring aortic valve calcification (AVC) load, this study aimed at defining: 1) independent physiologic/structural determinants of aortic valve area (AVA)/mean gradient (MG) relationship; 2) AVC thresholds best associated with severe aortic stenosis (AS); and 3) whether, in AS with discordant MG, severe calcified aortic valve disease is generally detected.Background Aortic stenosis with discordant markers of severity, AVA in severe range but low MG, is a conundrum, unresolved by outcome studies.Methods Patients (n = 646) with normal left ventricular ejection fraction AS underwent Doppler echocardiography and AVC measurement by MDCT. On the basis of AVA-indexed-to-body surface area (AVAi) and MG, patients were categorized as concordant severity grading (CG) with moderate AS (AVAi >0.6 cm²/m², MG <40 mm Hg), severe AS (AVAi ≤0.6 cm²/m², MG ≥ 40 mm Hg), discordant-severity-grading (DG) with low-MG (AVAi ≤0.6 cm(2)/m(2), MG <40 mm Hg), or high-MG (AVAi >0.6 cm(2)/m(2), MG ≥40 mm Hg).Results The MG (discordant in 29%) was strongly determined by AVA and flow but also independently and strongly influenced by AVC-load (p < 0.0001) and systemic arterial compliance (p < 0.0001). The AVC-load (median [interquartile range]) was similar within patients with DG (low-MG: 1,619 [965 to 2,528] arbitrary units [AU]; high-MG: 1,736 [1,209 to 2,894] AU; p = 0.49), higher than CG-moderate-AS (861 [427 to 1,519] AU; p < 0.0001) but lower than CG-severe-AS (2,931 [1,924 to 4,292] AU; p < 0.0001). The AVC-load thresholds separating severe/moderate AS were defined in CG-AS with normal flow (stroke-volume-index >35 ml/m(2)). The AVC-load, absolute or indexed, identified severe AS accurately (area under the curve ≥0.89, sensitivity ≥86%, specificity ≥79%) in men and women. Upon application of these criteria to DG-low MG, at least one-half of the patients were identified as severe calcified aortic valve disease, irrespective of flow.Conclusions Among patients with AS, MG is often discordant from AVA and is determined by multiple factors, valvular (AVC) and non-valvular (arterial compliance) independently of flow. The AVC-load by MDCT, strongly associated with AS severity, allows diagnosis of severe calcified aortic valve disease. At least one-half of the patients with discordant low gradient present with heavy AVC-load reflective of severe calcified aortic valve disease, emphasizing the clinical yield of AVC quantification by MDCT to diagnose and manage these complex patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1621

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 569

Metadata

Authors
Clavel, M.-A., Messika-Zeitoun, D., Pibarot, P., Aggarwal, S. R., Malouf, J., Araoz, P. A., Michelena, H. I., Cueff, C., Larose, E., Capoulade, R., Vahanian, A., & Enriquez-Sarano, M.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
  • Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec (CA)
  • Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Enriquez-Sarano, Maurice
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
62
Issue
24
Pages
2329-2338
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W68457931
Cited by
569
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 4
FWCI
22.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Corpus Université Laval (Université Laval) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Assistance Publique–Hopitaux de Paris
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
  • International Chair of Cardiometabolic Risk
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Keywords
aortic stenosis, aortic valve calcification, calcific aortic valve disease, aortic valve area, mean gradient, systemic arterial compliance, Doppler echocardiography, multidetector computed tomography, aortic valve replacement, transcatheter aortic valve implantation
MeSH terms
Aged, Analysis of Variance, Aortic Valve, Aortic Valve Stenosis, Blood Flow Velocity, Female, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Severity of Illness Index, Echocardiography, Doppler, Multivariate Analysis, Vascular Calcification, Multidetector Computed Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review