The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consideration of a New Definition of Clinically Relevant Myocardial Infarction After Coronary Revascularization
Open accessAbstract
Numerous definitions have been proposed for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI) after coronary revascularization. The universal definition for MI designates post procedural biomarker thresholds for defining percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-related MI (type 4a) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)-related MI (type 5), which are of uncertain prognostic importance. In addition, for both the MI types, cTn is recommended as the biomarker of choice, the prognostic significance of which is less well validated than CK-MB. Widespread adoption of a MI definition not clearly linked to subsequent adverse events such as mortality or heart failure may have serious consequences for the appropriate assessment of devices and therapies, may affect clinical care pathways, and may result in misinterpretation of physician competence. Rather than using an MI definition sensitive for small degrees of myonecrosis (the occurrence of which, based on contemporary large-scale studies, are unlikely to have important clinical consequences), it is instead recommended that a threshold level of biomarker elevation which has been strongly linked to subsequent adverse events in clinical studies be used to define a “clinically relevant MI.” The present document introduces a new definition for “clinically relevant MI” after coronary revascularization (PCI or CABG), which is applicable for use in clinical trials, patient care, and quality outcomes assessment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Optimal Medical Therapy with or without PCI for Stable Coronary Disease
Boden, W. E., O'Rourke, R. A., Teo, K. K., Hartigan, P. M., Maron, D. J., Kostuk, W. J., Knudtson, M., Dada, M., Casperson, P., Harris, C. L., et al. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa070829 · Cited by 4,699 · cited 1×
“It is our belief that the use of the definition of clinically relevant MI introduced in this document is a first step toward addressing these issues [54–99].”
Prediction of long-term prognosis in 12 169 men referred for cardiac rehabilitation
Kavanagh, T., Mertens, D. J., Hamm, L. F., Beyene, J., Kennedy, J., Corey, P., & Shephard, R. J. (2002) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000024413.15949.ed · Cited by 648
Cited by
Généreux, P., Piazza, N., Alu, M. C., Nazif, T., Hahn, R. T., Pibarot, P., Bax, J. J., Leipsic, J. A., Blanke, P., Blackstone, E. H., et al. (2021) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2021.02.038 · Cited by 1,313
Self-citationVARC-3 WRITING COMMITTEE, Généreux, P., Piazza, N., Alu, M. C., Nazif, T., Hahn, R. T., Pibarot, P., Bax, J. J., Leipsic, J. A., Blanke, P., et al. (2021) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa799 · Cited by 915
Self-citation2017 Cardiovascular and Stroke Endpoint Definitions for Clinical Trials
Hicks, K. A., Mahaffey, K. W., Mehran, R., Nissen, S. E., Wiviott, S. D., Dunn, B., Solomon, S. D., Marler, J. R., Teerlink, J. R., Farb, A., et al. (2018) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.117.033502 · Cited by 750
Self-citationHaude, M., Ince, H., Abizaid, A., Toelg, R., Lemos, P. A., von Birgelen, C., Christiansen, E. H., Wijns, W., Neumann, F.-J., Kaiser, C., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00447-x · Cited by 349
Konigstein, M., Ben-Yehuda, O., Smits, P. C., Love, M. P., Banai, S., Perlman, G. Y., Golomb, M., Ozan, M. O., Liu, M., Leon, M. B., et al. (2018) · JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2018.09.033 · Cited by 66
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Moussa, I. D., Klein, L. W., Shah, B., Mehran, R., Mack, M. J., Brilakis, E. S., Reilly, J. P., Zoghbi, G., Holper, E., & Stone, G. W.
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-10
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 1563-1570
- ISSN
- 0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1840021307
- Cited by
- 650
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 24.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consideration of a New Definition of Clinically Relevant Myocardial Infarction After Coronary Revascularization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.720
- The paper
- Moussa, I. D., Klein, L. W., Shah, B., Mehran, R., Mack, M. J., Brilakis, E. S., Reilly, J. P., Zoghbi, G., Holper, E., & Stone, G. W. (2013). Consideration of a New Definition of Clinically Relevant Myocardial Infarction After Coronary Revascularization. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.720
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
