Cited by 66Coronary Interventions and DiagnosticsAntiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular DiseasesAcute Myocardial Infarction Research

Outcomes Among Diabetic Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents

Open access
Konigstein, Maayan, Ben-Yehuda, Ori, Smits, Pieter C., Love, Michael P., Banai, Shmuel, Perlman, Gidon Y., Golomb, Mordechai, Ozan, Melek Ozgu +4 more·2018·JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions

Abstract

Objectives The authors sought to investigate the impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) on outcomes following contemporary drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in the BIONICS (BioNIR Ridaforolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in Coronary Stenosis) trial.Background Patients with DM are at increased risk for adverse events following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Methods A prospective, multicenter, 1:1 randomized trial was conducted to evaluate in a noninferiority design the safety and efficacy of ridaforolimus-eluting stents versus zotarolimus-eluting stents among 1,919 patients undergoing PCI. Randomization was stratified to the presence of medically treated DM, and a pre-specified analysis compared outcomes according to the presence or absence of DM up to 2 years.Results The overall prevalence of DM was 29.1% (559 of 1,919). DM patients had higher body mass index, greater prevalence of hyperlipidemia and hypertension, and smaller reference vessel diameter. One-year target lesion failure (cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization) was significantly higher among diabetic patients (7.8% vs. 4.2%; p = 0.002), mainly due to higher target lesion revascularization (4.5% vs. 2.0%; p = 0.002). Rates of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis did not statistically vary. Among 158 patients undergoing 13-month angiographic follow-up, restenosis rates were 3 times higher in diabetic patients compared with nondiabetic patients (15.2% vs. 4.7%; p = 0.01). Clinical and angiographic outcomes were similar between ridaforolimus-eluting stent- and zotarolimus-eluting stent-treated patients.Conclusions Despite advances in interventional therapies, and the implementation of new-generation DES, diabetic patients still have worse angiographic and clinical outcomes compared with nondiabetic patients undergoing PCI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.09.033

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Abaci A, Oguzhan A, Kahraman S, et al. Ef- fect of diabetes mellitus on formation of coro- nary collateral vessels. Circulation 1999;99: 2239-42.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Konigstein, M., Ben-Yehuda, O., Smits, P. C., Love, M. P., Banai, S., Perlman, G. Y., Golomb, M., Ozan, M. O., Liu, M., Leon, M. B., Stone, G. W., & Kandzari, D. E.
Affiliations
  • Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (IL)
  • Maasstad Ziekenhuis (NL)
  • St. Boniface Hospital (CA)
  • Hadassah Medical Center (IL)
  • Cardiovascular Research Foundation (US)
  • NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US)
  • Piedmont Atlanta Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Kandzari, David E.
Venue
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
11
Issue
24
Pages
2467-2476
ISSN
  • 1876-7605 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-8798
OpenAlex
W2903695177
Cited by
66
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
FWCI
6.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Abbott Vascular
  • Biotronik
  • Medtronic
  • Boston Scientific Corporation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Keywords
diabetes mellitus, percutaneous coronary intervention, drug-eluting stents, zotarolimus-eluting stent, target lesion failure, target lesion revascularization, in-stent restenosis, stent thrombosis, coronary artery disease
MeSH terms
Aged, Cardiovascular Agents, Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Thrombosis, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Prospective Studies, Prosthesis Design, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Prevalence, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome, Sirolimus, Coronary Restenosis, Coronary Stenosis, Drug-Eluting Stents, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review