Cited by 46Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlAdenosine and Purinergic Signaling

Adenosine and clinical forms of neurally-mediated syncope

Open access
Guieu, Regis, Deharo, Jean-Claude, Ruf, Jean, Mottola, Giovanna, Kipson, Nathalie, Bruzzese, Laurie, Gerolami, Victoria, Franceschi, Frederic +4 more·2015·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.04.066

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In patients with low-adenosine syncope, tilt testing is usually negative.

    “Unlike in VVS, tilt testing is usually negative. 4,226”

    From 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (2018) · cites this paper as [226]

    In the 6 July 2015 passage (page unavailable), the paper describes syncope without prodromes and carotid sinus syncope as low-adenosine forms, and reports a high incidence of positive tilt tests in typical VVS. It does not report that tilt tests are usually negative in the low-adenosine forms, so the main assertion is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guieu, R., Deharo, J.-C., Ruf, J., Mottola, G., Kipson, N., Bruzzese, L., Gerolami, V., Franceschi, F., Ungar, A., Tomaino, M., Iori, M., & Brignole, M.
Corresponding author
Brignole, Michele
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
66
Issue
2
Pages
204-205
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W749775541
Cited by
46
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3
FWCI
5.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2015-08-25)
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling
Keywords
adenosine, neurally mediated syncope, reflex syncope, cardiovascular health, syncope pathophysiology
MeSH terms
Adenosine, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Syncope, Vasovagal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review