Cited by 204Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 1 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Aβ Amyloid Pathology Affects the Hearts of Patients With Alzheimer’s Disease

Open access
Troncone, Luca, Luciani, Marco, Coggins, Matthew, Wilker, Elissa H., Ho, Cheng-Ying, Codispoti, Kari Elise, Frosch, Matthew P., Kayed, Rakez, del Monte, Federica·2016·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Background Individually, heart failure (HF) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) are severe threats to population health, and their potential coexistence is an alarming prospect. In addition to sharing analogous epidemiological and genetic profiles, biochemical characteristics, and common triggers, the authors recently recognized common molecular and pathological features between the 2 conditions. Whereas cognitive impairment has been linked to HF through perfusion defects, angiopathy, and inflammation, whether patients with AD present with myocardial dysfunction, and if the 2 conditions bear a common pathogenesis as neglected siblings are unknown. Objectives Here, the authors investigated whether amyloid beta (Aβ) protein aggregates are present in the hearts of patients with a primary diagnosis of AD, affecting myocardial function. Methods The authors examined myocardial function in a retrospective cross-sectional study from a cohort of AD patients and age-matched controls. Imaging and proteomics approaches were used to identify and quantify Aβ deposits in AD heart and brain specimens compared with controls. Cell shortening and calcium transients were measured on isolated adult cardiomyocytes. Results Echocardiographic measurements of myocardial function suggest that patients with AD present with an anticipated diastolic dysfunction. As in the brain, Aβ 40 and Aβ 42 are present in the heart, and their expression is increased in AD. Conclusions Here, the authors provide the first report of the presence of compromised myocardial function and intramyocardial deposits of Aβ in AD patients. The findings depict a novel biological framework in which AD may be viewed either as a systemic disease or as a metastatic disorder leading to heart, and possibly multiorgan failure. AD and HF are both debilitating and life-threatening conditions, affecting enormous patient populations. Our findings underline a previously dismissed problem of a magnitude that will require new diagnostic approaches and treatments for brain and heart disease, and their combination.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This study reports that patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) show anticipated diastolic myocardial dysfunction and that Aβ40/Aβ42 deposits are present in AD myocardium, where they are increased relative to controls. The authors propose that AD may involve the heart as part of a systemic or metastatic amyloid process.

Key findings

  • AD was associated with earlier diastolic dysfunction: in the first age tertile, mitral valve E/A ratio was 1.20 ± 0.18 in AD vs. 1.34 ± 0.12 in controls, with a linear regression F-test p < 0.05; in the third tertile, values were 0.82 ± 0.08 vs. 0.86 ± 0.08.
  • Left ventricular wall thickness and aortic valve peak velocity were increased only in older AD subjects: LVSWT 1.12 ± 0.05 vs. 1.01 ± 0.04 (p < 0.05), LVILT 1.07 ± 0.05 vs. 1.00 ± 0.03 (p < 0.05), and aortic valve peak velocity 2.44 ± 0.41 vs. 1.51 ± 0.14 (p < 0.05).
  • Aβ40 and Aβ42 were present in heart and brain by immunoblotting and ELISA, with increased levels in AD patients compared with controls; heart levels were lower than brain levels.
  • Immunogold TEM detected Aβ42-PAO/VIA-positive staining in AD myocardium, and isolated AD cardiomyocytes showed slower relaxation (R50 0.272 vs. 0.238) and prolonged Ca2+ transients (TTP 0.544 vs. 0.151; R90 0.328 vs. 0.084) compared with controls, though no statistical calculations were performed because only 3 cardiomyocytes from 1 AD case were measured.

Methods

  • Retrospective cross-sectional clinical cohort of AD patients and age/sex/ethnicity-matched controls at a 1:2 ratio, excluding other underlying conditions affecting myocardial function; echocardiographic measures were analyzed with linear regression adjusted for age, exploratory age tertiles, Student t-tests, ordinary least squares, and ANOVA for beta-blocker therapy.
  • A separate cohort provided fresh heart and brain specimens from 4 clinically diagnosed AD cases and controls; imaging included Thioflavin S, silver stain, A11 immunohistochemistry, transmission electron microscopy, and immunogold TEM with anti-Aβ42 and Aβ42-PAO VIA antibodies.
  • Molecular quantification used immunoblotting and ELISA for Aβ peptides; adult left ventricular cardiomyocytes were isolated by enzymatic digestion, and contractility and Ca2+ transients were measured with video edge-detection and dual-excitation systems.

Limitations

  • The paper states that sample numbers were limited for clinical, pathological, and molecular assessment; the cross-sectional design cannot infer temporality; cardiomyocyte function came from only 3 myocytes of the youngest AD case; brain samples were cortical only; detailed cardiac function was not always available; and E/E′ was unavailable retrospectively.
  • Evident from the text: the AD tissue cohort was very small (4 cases), the cardiomyocyte comparison used 1 AD heart versus 2 female control hearts, and no statistical testing was done for cardiomyocyte data.
  • Evident from the text: beta-blocker use was imbalanced (1 AD case vs. about one-third of controls), although ANOVA found no difference in diastolic function between control groups with and without beta-blocker therapy.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.08.073

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 1 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 6 claims

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Age of the pathologically confirmed case differs

    Minor

    The tissue-sample list identifies the pathologically confirmed AD case as 70 years old, but the limitations section refers to a 71-year-old case. No 71-year-old case appears in the list.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 53 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Divry, 1927, Etude histochimique des plaques séniles, J Belge Neurol Psychiatr, 9, 649

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 204

Metadata

Authors
Troncone, L., Luciani, M., Coggins, M., Wilker, E. H., Ho, C.-Y., Codispoti, K. E., Frosch, M. P., Kayed, R., & del Monte, F.
Affiliations
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
68
Issue
22
Pages
2395-2407
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2558472983
Cited by
204
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 3
FWCI
12.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • American Heart Association (14IRG18980028, AHA 14IRG18980028)
  • Società Italiana di Cardiologia
  • National Institutes of Health (R01HL098468)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01 HL098468, R21HL102716)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, amyloid-beta, cardiac amyloidosis, heart failure, cardiac dysfunction, cardiomyocytes, calcium transients, cardiomyocyte shortening, systemic amyloidosis, multiple organ failure
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Cross-Sectional Studies, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Female, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Cardiomyopathies, Myocardium, Retrospective Studies, Immunoblotting, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Microscopy, Electron, Transmission

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-30, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-30 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review