The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detection of Atherosclerotic Inflammation by 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET Compared to [ 18 F]FDG PET Imaging
Open accessAbstract
Inflammation drives atherosclerotic plaque rupture. Although inflammation can be measured using fluorine-18-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ([18F]FDG PET), [18F]FDG lacks cell specificity, and coronary imaging is unreliable because of myocardial spillover. This study tested the efficacy of gallium-68-labeled DOTATATE (68Ga-DOTATATE), a somatostatin receptor subtype-2 (SST2)-binding PET tracer, for imaging atherosclerotic inflammation. We confirmed 68Ga-DOTATATE binding in macrophages and excised carotid plaques. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET imaging was compared to [18F]FDG PET imaging in 42 patients with atherosclerosis. Target SSTR2 gene expression occurred exclusively in “proinflammatory” M1 macrophages, specific 68Ga-DOTATATE ligand binding to SST2 receptors occurred in CD68-positive macrophage-rich carotid plaque regions, and carotid SSTR2 mRNA was highly correlated with in vivo 68Ga-DOTATATE PET signals (r = 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28 to 0.99; p = 0.02). 68Ga-DOTATATE mean of maximum tissue-to-blood ratios (mTBRmax) correctly identified culprit versus nonculprit arteries in patients with acute coronary syndrome (median difference: 0.69; interquartile range [IQR]: 0.22 to 1.15; p = 0.008) and transient ischemic attack/stroke (median difference: 0.13; IQR: 0.07 to 0.32; p = 0.003). 68Ga-DOTATATE mTBRmax predicted high-risk coronary computed tomography features (receiver operating characteristics area under the curve [ROC AUC]: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.80 to 0.92; p < 0.0001), and correlated with Framingham risk score (r = 0.53; 95% CI: 0.32 to 0.69; p <0.0001) and [18F]FDG uptake (r = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.64 to 0.81; p < 0.0001). [18F]FDG mTBRmax differentiated culprit from nonculprit carotid lesions (median difference: 0.12; IQR: 0.0 to 0.23; p = 0.008) and high-risk from lower-risk coronary arteries (ROC AUC: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.62 to 0.91; p = 0.002); however, myocardial [18F]FDG spillover rendered coronary [18F]FDG scans uninterpretable in 27 patients (64%). Coronary 68Ga-DOTATATE PET scans were readable in all patients. We validated 68Ga-DOTATATE PET as a novel marker of atherosclerotic inflammation and confirmed that 68Ga-DOTATATE offers superior coronary imaging, excellent macrophage specificity, and better power to discriminate high-risk versus low-risk coronary lesions than [18F]FDG. (Vascular Inflammation Imaging Using Somatostatin Receptor Positron Emission Tomography [VISION]; NCT02021188)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reubi, J. C., Schär, J.-C., Waser, B., Wenger, S., Heppeler, A., Schmitt, J. S., & Mäcke, H. R. (2000) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s002590050034 · Cited by 1,127
Joshi, N. V., Vesey, A. T., Williams, M. C., Shah, A. S. V., Calvert, P. A., Craighead, F. H. M., Yeoh, S. E., Wallace, W., Salter, D., Fletcher, A. M., et al. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61754-7 · Cited by 953
Self-citationMotoyama, S., Ito, H., Sarai, M., Kondo, T., Kawai, H., Nagahara, Y., Harigaya, H., Kan, S., Anno, H., Takahashi, H., et al. (2015) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2015.05.069 · Cited by 831
Identifying active vascular microcalcification by 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography
Irkle, A., Vesey, A. T., Lewis, D. Y., Skepper, J. N., Bird, J. L. E., Dweck, M. R., Joshi, F. R., Gallagher, F. A., Warburton, E. A., Bennett, M. R., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms8495 · Cited by 468
Self-citationPET imaging of inflammation in atherosclerosis
Tarkin, J. M., Joshi, F. R., & Rudd, J. H. F. (2014) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2014.80 · Cited by 386
Self-citationFinn, A. V., Nakano, M., Polavarapu, R., Karmali, V., Saeed, O., Zhao, X., Yazdani, S., Otsuka, F., Davis, T., Habib, A., et al. (2012) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.10.852 · Cited by 333
Hypoxia But Not Inflammation Augments Glucose Uptake in Human Macrophages
Folco, E. J., Sheikine, Y., Rocha, V. Z., Christen, T., Shvartz, E., Sukhova, G. K., Di Carli, M. F., & Libby, P. (2011) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.03.044 · Cited by 326
Leukocytes Link Local and Systemic Inflammation in Ischemic Cardiovascular Disease
Libby, P., Nahrendorf, M., & Swirski, F. K. (2016) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2015.12.048 · Cited by 324
on behalf of the Cardiovascular Committee of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), Bucerius, J., Hyafil, F., Verberne, H. J., Slart, R. H. J. A., Lindner, O., Sciagra, R., Agostini, D., Übleis, C., Gimelli, A., et al. (2016) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-015-3259-3 · Cited by 257
Dalm, V. A. S. H., van Hagen, P. M., van Koetsveld, P. M., Achilefu, S., Houtsmuller, A. B., Pols, D. H. J., van der Lely, A.-J., Lamberts, S. W. J., & Hofland, L. J. (2003) · American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00048.2003 · Cited by 177
Cited by
Assessing the interactions between radiotherapy and antitumour immunity
Grassberger, C., Ellsworth, S. G., Wilks, M. Q., Keane, F. K., & Loeffler, J. S. (2019) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-019-0238-9 · Cited by 244
Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging advances in the 21st century
Vaz, S. C., Oliveira, F., Herrmann, K., & Veit-Haibach, P. (2020) · The British Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1259/bjr.20200095 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Tarkin, J. M., Joshi, F. R., Evans, N. R., Chowdhury, M. M., Figg, N. L., Shah, A. V., Starks, L. T., Martin-Garrido, A., Manavaki, R., Yu, E., Kuc, R. E., Grassi, L., Kreuzhuber, R., Kostadima, M. A., Frontini, M., Kirkpatrick, P. J., Coughlin, P. A., Gopalan, D., Fryer, T. D., Buscombe, J. R., Groves, A. M., Ouwehand, W. H., Bennett, M. R., Warburton, E. A., Davenport, A. P., & Rudd, J. H. F.
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-04
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 1774-1791
- ISSN
- 0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2605265231
- Cited by
- 445
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 31.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of Atherosclerotic Inflammation by 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET Compared to [ 18 F]FDG PET Imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.060
- The paper
- Tarkin, J. M., Joshi, F. R., Evans, N. R., Chowdhury, M. M., Figg, N. L., Shah, A. V., Starks, L. T., Martin-Garrido, A., Manavaki, R., Yu, E., Kuc, R. E., Grassi, L., Kreuzhuber, R., Kostadima, M. A., Frontini, M., Kirkpatrick, P. J., Coughlin, P. A., Gopalan, D., Fryer, T. D., . . . Rudd, J. H. F. (2017). Detection of Atherosclerotic Inflammation by 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET Compared to [ 18 F]FDG PET Imaging. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.060
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.