The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin Concentration and Risk of First-Ever Cardiovascular Outcomes in 154,052 Participants
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: High-sensitivity assays can quantify cardiac troponins I and T (hs-cTnI, hs-cTnT) in individuals with no clinically manifest myocardial injury. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to assess associations of cardiac troponin concentration with cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes in primary prevention studies. METHODS: A search was conducted of PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE for prospective studies published up to September 2016, reporting on associations of cardiac troponin concentration with first-ever CVD outcomes (i.e., coronary heart disease [CHD], stroke, or the combination of both). Study-specific estimates, adjusted for conventional risk factors, were extracted by 2 independent reviewers, supplemented with de novo data from PROSPER (Pravastatin in Elderly Individuals at Risk of Vascular Disease Study), then pooled by using random effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 28 relevant studies were identified involving 154,052 participants. Cardiac troponin was detectable in 80.0% (hs-cTnI: 82.6%; hs-cTnT: 69.7%). In PROSPER, positive associations of log-linear shape were observed between hs-cTnT and CVD outcomes. In the meta-analysis, the relative risks comparing the top versus the bottom troponin third were 1.43 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.31 to 1.56) for CVD (11,763 events), 1.67 (95% CI: 1.50 to 1.86) for fatal CVD (7,775 events), 1.59 (95% CI: 1.38 to 1.83) for CHD (7,061 events), and 1.35 (95% CI: 1.23 to 1.48) for stroke (2,526 events). For fatal CVD, associations were stronger in North American studies (p = 0.010) and those measuring hs-cTnT rather than hs-cTnI (p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: In the general population, high cardiac troponin concentration within the normal range is associated with increased CVD risk. This association is independent of conventional risk factors, strongest for fatal CVD, and applies to both CHD and stroke.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shepherd, J., Blauw, G. J., Murphy, M. B., Bollen, E. L., Buckley, B. M., Cobbe, S. M., Ford, I., Gaw, A., Hyland, M., Jukema, J. W., et al. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11600-x · Cited by 3,378
Self-citationControlling the risk of spurious findings from meta-regression
Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2004) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1752 · Cited by 1,267 · cited 1×
“Subgroup analyses were conducted by using meta-regression across pre-specified studylevel characteristics (39).”
MethodAnalytical Characteristics of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin Assays
Apple, F. S., Collinson, P. O., & for the IFCC Task Force on Clinical Applications of Cardiac Biomarkers (2012) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2011.165795 · Cited by 861
Prognostic Utility of Novel Biomarkers of Cardiovascular Stress: The Framingham Heart Study
Wang, T. J., Wollert, K. C., Larson, M. G., Coglianese, E., McCabe, E. L., Cheng, S., Ho, J. E., Fradley, M. G., Ghorbani, A., Xanthakis, V., et al. (2012) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.112.129437 · Cited by 482
Discrimination and Net Reclassification of Cardiovascular Risk With Lipoprotein(a)
Willeit, P., Kiechl, S., Kronenberg, F., Witztum, J. L., Santer, P., Mayr, M., Xu, Q., Mayr, A., Willeit, J., & Tsimikas, S. (2014) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.03.061 · Cited by 286
Self-citation
Cited by
2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice
Visseren, F. L. J., Mach, F., Smulders, Y. M., Carballo, D., Koskinas, K. C., Bäck, M., Benetos, A., Biffi, A., Boavida, J.-M., Capodanno, D., et al. (2021) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484 · Cited by 6,485
Self-citationDiretrizes Brasileiras de Hipertensão Arterial – 2020
Barroso, W. K. S., Rodrigues, C. I. S., Bortolotto, L. A., Mota-Gomes, M. A., Brandão, A. A., Feitosa, A. D. D. M., Machado, C. A., Poli-de-Figueiredo, C. E., Amodeo, C., Mion, D., et al. (2021) · Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia · doi:10.36660/abc.20201238 · Cited by 1,068
Prognostic value of cardiovascular biomarkers in the population
Neumann, J. T., Twerenbold, R., Weimann, J., Ballantyne, C. M., Benjamin, E. J., Costanzo, S., de Lemos, J. A., deFilippi, C. R., Di Castelnuovo, A., Donfrancesco, C., et al. (2024) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2024.5596 · Cited by 125
He, W. B., Ko, H. T. K., Curtis, A. J., Zoungas, S., Woods, R. L., Tonkin, A., Neumann, J. T., Turner, S. L., & Hopper, I. (2023) · Heart, Lung and Circulation · doi:10.1016/j.hlc.2023.04.300 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Willeit, P., Welsh, P., Evans, J. D. W., Tschiderer, L., Boachie, C., Jukema, J. W., Ford, I., Trompet, S., Stott, D. J., Kearney, P. M., Mooijaart, S. P., Kiechl, S., Di Angelantonio, E., & Sattar, N.
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-08
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 558-568
- ISSN
- 0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2737636085
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 19.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin Concentration and Risk of First-Ever Cardiovascular Outcomes in 154,052 Participants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.05.062
- The paper
- Willeit, P., Welsh, P., Evans, J. D. W., Tschiderer, L., Boachie, C., Jukema, J. W., Ford, I., Trompet, S., Stott, D. J., Kearney, P. M., Mooijaart, S. P., Kiechl, S., Di Angelantonio, E., & Sattar, N. (2017). High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin Concentration and Risk of First-Ever Cardiovascular Outcomes in 154,052 Participants. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.05.062
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.