Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 274

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cardiac Radiation Dose, Cardiac Disease, and Mortality in Patients With Lung Cancer

Open access
Atkins, Katelyn M., Rawal, Bhupendra, Chaunzwa, Tafadzwa L., Lamba, Nayan, Bitterman, Danielle S., Williams, Christopher L., Kozono, David E., Baldini, Elizabeth H., Chen, Aileen B., Nguyen, Paul L., D’Amico, Anthony V., Nohria, Anju, Hoffmann, Udo, Aerts, Hugo J.W.L., Mak, Raymond H.·2019·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy-associated cardiac toxicity studies in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been limited by small sample size and nonvalidated cardiac endpoints. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this analysis was to ascertain whether cardiac radiation dose is a predictor of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and all-cause mortality (ACM). METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 748 consecutive locally advanced NSCLC patients treated with thoracic radiotherapy. Fine and Gray and Cox regressions were used to identify predictors for MACE and ACM, adjusting for lung cancer and cardiovascular prognostic factors, including pre-existing coronary heart disease (CHD). RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 20.4 months, 77 patients developed ≥1 MACE (2-year cumulative incidence, 5.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.3% to 7.7%), and 533 died. Mean radiation dose delivered to the heart (mean heart dose) was associated with a significantly increased risk of MACE (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.05/Gy; 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.08/Gy; p < 0.001) and ACM (adjusted HR: 1.02/Gy; 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.03/Gy; p = 0.007). Mean heart dose (≥10 Gy vs. <10 Gy) was associated with a significantly increased risk of ACM in CHD-negative patients (178 vs. 118 deaths; HR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.69; p = 0.014) with 2-year estimates of 52.2% (95% CI: 46.1% to 58.5%) versus 40.0% (95% CI: 33.5% to 47.4%); but not among CHD-positive patients (112 vs. 82 deaths; HR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.70 to 1.25; p = 0.66) with 2-year estimates of 54.6% (95% CI: 46.8% to 62.7%) versus 50.8% (95% CI: 41.5% to 60.9%), respectively (p for interaction = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the competing risk of cancer-specific death in locally advanced NSCLC patients, cardiac radiation dose exposure is a modifiable cardiac risk factor for MACE and ACM, supporting the need for early recognition and treatment of cardiovascular events and more stringent avoidance of high cardiac radiotherapy dose.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.500

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Metadata

Authors
Atkins, K. M., Rawal, B., Chaunzwa, T. L., Lamba, N., Bitterman, D. S., Williams, C. L., Kozono, D. E., Baldini, E. H., Chen, A. B., Nguyen, P. L., D’Amico, A. V., Nohria, A., Hoffmann, U., Aerts, H. J. W. L., & Mak, R. H.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
73
Issue
23
Pages
2976-2987
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2952155820
Cited by
274
References
7
FWCI
21.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cardiac Radiation Dose, Cardiac Disease, and Mortality in Patients With Lung Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.500
The paper
Atkins, K. M., Rawal, B., Chaunzwa, T. L., Lamba, N., Bitterman, D. S., Williams, C. L., Kozono, D. E., Baldini, E. H., Chen, A. B., Nguyen, P. L., D’Amico, A. V., Nohria, A., Hoffmann, U., Aerts, H. J. W. L., & Mak, R. H. (2019). Cardiac Radiation Dose, Cardiac Disease, and Mortality in Patients With Lung Cancer. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.500

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.