Cited by 55Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementHeart rate and cardiovascular healthAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes

Digoxin discontinuation and outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Open access
Malik, Awais, Masson, Ravi, Singh, Steven, Wu, Wen-Chih, Packer, Milton, Pitt, Bertram, Waagstein, Finn, Morgan, Charity J. +3 more·2019·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Background The deleterious effects of discontinuation of digoxin on outcomes in ambulatory patients with chronic heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are well-documented.Objectives The authors sought to determine the relationship between digoxin discontinuation and outcomes in hospitalized patients with HFrEF receiving more contemporary guideline-directed medical therapies including beta-blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists.Methods Of the 11,900 hospitalized patients with HFrEF (EF ≤45%) in the Medicare-linked OPTIMIZE-HF (Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure) registry, 3,499 received pre-admission digoxin, which was discontinued in 721 patients. Using propensity scores for digoxin discontinuation, estimated for each of the 3,499 patients, a matched cohort of 698 pairs of patients, balanced on 50 baseline characteristics (mean age 76 years; mean EF 28%; 41% women; 13% African American; 65% on beta-blockers) was assembled.Results Four-year post-discharge, digoxin discontinuation was associated with significantly higher risks of HF readmission (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05 to 1.39; p = 0.007), all-cause readmission (HR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.31; p = 0.010), and the combined endpoint of HF readmission or all-cause mortality (HR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.34; p = 0.002), but not all-cause mortality (HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.97 to 1.24; p = 0.163). Discontinuation of digoxin was associated with a significantly higher risk of all 4 outcomes at 6 months and 1 year post-discharge. At 30 days, digoxin discontinuation was associated with higher risks of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.26 to 2.57; p = 0.001) and the combined endpoint (HR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.71; p = 0.007), but not of HF readmission (HR: 1.19; 95% CI: 0.90 to 1.59; p = 0.226) or all-cause readmission (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.84 to 1.26; p = 0.778).Conclusions Among hospitalized older patients with HFrEF on more contemporary guideline-directed medical therapies, discontinuation of pre-admission digoxin therapy was associated with poor outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.05.064

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Malik, A., Masson, R., Singh, S., Wu, W.-C., Packer, M., Pitt, B., Waagstein, F., Morgan, C. J., Allman, R. M., Fonarow, G. C., & Ahmed, A.
Affiliations
  • Georgetown University (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • Baylor University Medical Center (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • Veterans Health Administration (US)
  • George Washington University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Ahmed, Ali
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
74
Issue
5
Pages
617-627
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2965239074
Cited by
55
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4
FWCI
5.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (R01-HL085561, R01-HL085561-S, R01-HL097047)
  • Amgen
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • GlaxoSmithKline (R01-HL085561, R01-HL097047)
  • Sanofi
  • Gilead Sciences
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Daiichi-Sankyo
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Relypsa
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01-HL085561-S, R01HL097047, R01HL085561)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart rate and cardiovascular health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Keywords
heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, heart failure readmission, all-cause mortality, guideline-directed medical therapy, beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, ACE inhibitors, hospitalized heart failure patients, post-discharge outcomes, propensity score matching, Medicare beneficiaries
MeSH terms
Aged, Cardiotonic Agents, Cause of Death, Digoxin, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Outpatients, Patient Readmission, Registries, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Stroke Volume, United States, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome, Withholding Treatment, Propensity Score

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review