The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Race/Ethnicity and Prevalence of Aortic Stenosis by Echocardiography in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a recent study of 2,283 elderly NH-Black and NH-White patients, the prevalence of AV calcification was highest among White males, followed by Black males, White females, and Black females.
“A recent study examined the rates of AV calcification using non-contrast CT in 2,283 elderly NH-Black and NH-White patients from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. The authors found that the prevalence of AV calcification was highest among White males, followed by Black males, White females, and Black females individuals25.”
From Characterization of Aortic Valve Stenosis by CT Angiography in a Diverse US Cohort (2025) · cites this paper as [25]
The Abstract describes 3,032 MESA participants assessed by transthoracic echocardiography for aortic stenosis—not 2,283 ARIC participants assessed by non-contrast CT for aortic-valve calcification. It reports prevalence by race/ethnicity, but gives no male–female ranking for calcification. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Brennan, 2020, Racial differences in the use of aortic valve replacement for treatment of symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis in the transcatheter aortic valve replacement era, J Am Heart Assoc, 9, e015879, 10.1161/JAHA.119.015879 · DOI
- Patel, 2014, Racial differences in the prevalence of severe aortic stenosis, J Am Heart Assoc, 3
- Baumgartner, 2009, Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice, J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 22, 1, 10.1016/j.echo.2008.11.029 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2023 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association
Tsao, C. W., Aday, A. W., Almarzooq, Z. I., Anderson, C. A. M., Arora, P., Avery, C. L., Baker-Smith, C. M., Beaton, A. Z., Boehme, A. K., Buxton, A. E., et al. (2023) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000001123 · Cited by 8,300
Characterization of Aortic Valve Stenosis by CT Angiography in a Diverse US Cohort
Lorenzatti, D., Filtz, A., Pina, P., Geers, J., Gilman, J., Daich, J., Ippolito, P., Aftab, A., Schenone, A. L., Gongora, C. A., et al. (2025) · Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging · doi:10.1161/circimaging.124.017858 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Czarny, M. J., Shah, S. J., Whelton, S. P., Blaha, M. J., Tsai, M. Y., Denis, R., Bertoni, A., & Post, W. S.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
- Corresponding author
- Czarny, Matthew J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-07
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 195-197
- ISSN
- 0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8282359
- OpenAlex
- W3163127554
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 3.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- GlaxoSmithKline
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- United Therapeutics Corporation
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (75N92020D00001, 75N92020D00002, 75N92020D00003, 75N92020D00004, 75N92020D00005, 75N92020D00006, 75N92020D00007, HHSN268201500003I, N01-HC-95159, N01-HC-95160, N01-HC-95161, N01-HC-95162, N01-HC-95163, N01-HC-95164, N01-HC-95165, N01-HC-95166, N01-HC-95167, N01-HC-95168, N01-HC-95169, R01HL127028, UL1-TR-000040, UL1-TR-001079, UL1-TR-001420)
- Pfizer
- National Institutes of Health (T32HL007227)
- Cytokinetics
- Eisai
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- aortic stenosis, racial and ethnic differences, prevalence, Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, echocardiography, Black participants, Hispanic participants, Chinese participants, White participants
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aortic Valve Stenosis, Echocardiography, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, United States, Cohort Studies, Prevalence, Racial Groups
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
