Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 319

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cardiovascular Disease Risk Among Cancer Survivors

Open access
Florido, Roberta, Daya, Natalie R., Ndumele, Chiadi E., Koton, Silvia, Russell, Stuart D., Prizment, Anna, Blumenthal, Roger S., Matsushita, Kunihiro, Mok, Yejin, Felix, Ashley S., Coresh, Josef, Joshu, Corinne E., Platz, Elizabeth A., Selvin, Elizabeth·2022·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Background: Over 80% of adult patients diagnosed with cancer survive long-term. Long-term complications of cancer and its therapies may increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), but prospective studies utilizing adjudicated cancer and CVD events are lacking. Objectives: Assess the risk of CVD in cancer survivors in a prospective community-based study. Methods: We included 12,414 ARIC participants. Cancer diagnoses were ascertained via linkage with state registries supplemented with medical records. Incident CVD outcomes were coronary heart disease (CHD), heart failure (HF), stroke, and a composite of these endpoints. We used multivariable Poisson and Cox regression to estimate the association of cancer with incident CVD. Results: Mean age was 54, 55% were female, and 25% Black. 3,250 (25%) participants had incident cancer over a median 13.6 years of follow-up. Age-adjusted IR of CVD (per 1,000 person-years) were 27.0 (24.7, 29.1) for cancer survivors and 12.0 (11.5, 12.4) for non-cancer controls. After adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors, cancer survivors had significantly higher risks of CVD (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.26, 1.50), HF (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.38, 1.68), and stroke (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.03, 1.44), but not CHD (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.97, 1.28). Breast, lung, colorectal, and hematologic/lymphatic cancers, but not prostate cancer, were significantly associated with CVD risk. Conclusions: Compared to persons without cancer, adult cancer survivors have significantly higher risk of CVD, especially HF, independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors. There is an unmet need to define strategies for CVD prevention in this high-risk population.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.04.042

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

See all 319

Metadata

Authors
Florido, R., Daya, N. R., Ndumele, C. E., Koton, S., Russell, S. D., Prizment, A., Blumenthal, R. S., Matsushita, K., Mok, Y., Felix, A. S., Coresh, J., Joshu, C. E., Platz, E. A., & Selvin, E.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-07
Volume
80
Issue
1
Pages
22-32
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283772666
Cited by
319
References
32
FWCI
36.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cardiovascular Disease Risk Among Cancer Survivors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.04.042
The paper
Florido, R., Daya, N. R., Ndumele, C. E., Koton, S., Russell, S. D., Prizment, A., Blumenthal, R. S., Matsushita, K., Mok, Y., Felix, A. S., Coresh, J., Joshu, C. E., Platz, E. A., & Selvin, E. (2022). Cardiovascular Disease Risk Among Cancer Survivors. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.04.042

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.