Cited by 153ECG Monitoring and AnalysisArtificial Intelligence in HealthcarePhonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques

Deep Learning Electrocardiographic Analysis for Detection of Left-Sided Valvular Heart Disease

Open access
Elias, Pierre, Poterucha, Timothy J., Rajaram, Vijay, Moller, Luca Matos, Rodriguez, Victor, Bhave, Shreyas, Hahn, Rebecca T., Tison, Geoffrey +18 more·2022·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Valvular heart disease is an important contributor to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and remains underdiagnosed. Deep learning analysis of electrocardiography (ECG) may be useful in detecting aortic stenosis (AS), aortic regurgitation (AR), and mitral regurgitation (MR). OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to develop ECG deep learning algorithms to identify moderate or severe AS, AR, and MR alone and in combination. METHODS: A total of 77,163 patients undergoing ECG within 1 year before echocardiography from 2005-2021 were identified and split into train (n = 43,165), validation (n = 12,950), and test sets (n = 21,048; 7.8% with any of AS, AR, or MR). Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver-operating characteristic (AU-ROC) and precision-recall curves. Outside validation was conducted on an independent data set. Test accuracy was modeled using different disease prevalence levels to simulate screening efficacy using the deep learning model. RESULTS: The deep learning algorithm model accuracy was as follows: AS (AU-ROC: 0.88), AR (AU-ROC: 0.77), MR (AU-ROC: 0.83), and any of AS, AR, or MR (AU-ROC: 0.84; sensitivity 78%, specificity 73%) with similar accuracy in external validation. In screening program modeling, test characteristics were dependent on underlying prevalence and selected sensitivity levels. At a prevalence of 7.8%, the positive and negative predictive values were 20% and 97.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Deep learning analysis of the ECG can accurately detect AS, AR, and MR in this multicenter cohort and may serve as the basis for the development of a valvular heart disease screening program.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.05.029

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Valvular and composite SHD AI-ECG models are promising for referral enrichment.

    “Valvular and composite SHD models are promising for referral enrichment”

    From AI-ECG for Echocardiography Triage in Structural Heart Disease: Evidence, Implementation, and Future Directions (2026) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) models ECG-positive patients receiving follow-up echocardiography and suggests that about five scans would identify one case of moderate or severe valvular disease, supporting the proposed referral use. The Results (page unavailable) report models for individual valve lesions and a composite of aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation, or mitral regurgitation. That composite does not establish performance for a broader structural heart disease (SHD) model. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Deep learning has been shown to be beneficial in detecting specific heart diseases from the 12-lead ECG, including aortic stenosis, low LVEF, low left ventricular hypertrophy and composites of valvular diseases.

    “The application of deep learning, a subset of artificial intelligence (AI), has been shown to be beneficial in the detection of specific heart diseases from the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). This includes conditions such as aortic stenosis, low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and low left ventricular hypertrophy, as well as composites of many valvular diseases3,17–21.”

    From Detecting structural heart disease from electrocardiograms using AI (2025) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Discussion reports that the ECG model detected aortic stenosis and a composite of three valvular diseases. The Conclusions also describe prior ECG-based detection of left ventricular systolic dysfunction, consistent with low LVEF. But the paper does not report detection of “low left ventricular hypertrophy”; it mentions hypertrophy as a possible consequence of aortic stenosis, not as a detected condition. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The Columbia-led ValveNet study in 77,163 patients achieved AUROC of 0.88 for AS, 0.77 for AR, and 0.83 for mitral regurgitation, with similar overall accuracy in external validation.

    “In 77,163 patients, the model achieved area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.88 for AS, 0.77 for AR, and 0.83 for mitral regurgitation (MR), with similar overall accuracy in external validation.21”
  • ValveNet was a similarly architected AI-ECG model trained to detect moderate or greater left-sided VHD (aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation and mitral regurgitation), a subset of SHD.

    “Before development of EchoNext, study investigators had created ValveNet, a similarly architected AI-ECG model trained to detect moderate or greater left-sided VHD (specifically aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation and mitral regurgitation), a subset of SHD3.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. [1]1. Otto C.M., Nishimura R.A., Bonow R.O., et al. 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021;77:4: 450-500. Go to Citation Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  2. [2]2. Leon M.B., Smith C.R., Mack M.J., et al. Transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2016;374:17: 1609-1620. Go to Citation Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  3. [3]3. Stone G.W., Lindenfeld J., Abraham W.T., et al. Transcatheter mitral-valve repair in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med 2018;379:24: 2307-2318. Go to Citation Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  4. [4]4. van Bommel R.J., Marsan N.A., Delgado V., et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy as a therapeutic option in patients with moderate-severe functional mitral regurgitation and high operative risk. Circulation 2011;124:8: 912-919. Go to Citation Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  5. [5]5. Kang D.H., Park S.J., Lee S.A., et al. Early surgery or conservative care for asymptomatic aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 2020;382:2: 111-119. Crossref PubMed Google Scholar a [...] of VHD represents a pressing clinical need. b [...] worse outcomes seen in advanced disease.
  6. [6]6. Suri R.M., Vanoverschelde J.L., Grigioni F., et al. Association between early surgical intervention vs watchful waiting and outcomes for mitral regurgitation due to flail mitral valve leaflets. JAMA 2013;310:6: 609-616. Go to Citation Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  7. [7]7. Yang L.T., Michelena H.I., Scott C.G., et al. Outcomes in chronic hemodynamically significant aortic regurgitation and limitations of current guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;73:14: 1741-1752. Crossref PubMed Google Scholar a [...] of VHD represents a pressing clinical need. b [...] worse outcomes seen in advanced disease.
  8. [8]8. d'Arcy J.L., Coffey S., Loudon M.A., et al. Large-scale community echocardiographic screening reveals a major burden of undiagnosed valvular heart disease in older people: the OxVALVE Population Cohort Study. Eur Heart J 2016;37:47: 3515-3522. Crossref PubMed Google Scholar a [...] age, with over one-half being undiagnosed. b [...] to VHD-related morbidity and mortality.
  9. [9]9. Osnabrugge R.L., Mylotte D., Head S.J., et al. Aortic stenosis in the elderly: disease prevalence and number of candidates for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis and modeling study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:11: 1002-1012. Go to Citation Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  10. [10]10. Nkomo V.T., Gardin J.M., Skelton T.N., Gottdiener J.S., Scott C.G., Enriquez-Sarano M. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet 2006;368:9540: 1005-1011. Crossref PubMed Google Scholar a [...] age, with over one-half being undiagnosed. b [...] to VHD-related morbidity and mortality.
  11. [11]11. Lindman B.R., Dweck M.R., Lancellotti P., et al. Management of asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: evolving concepts in timing of valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2020;13:2 Pt 1: 481-493. Go to Citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. [12]12. Goldstone A.B., Patrick W.L., Cohen J.E., Aribeana C.N., Popat R., Woo Y.J. Early surgical intervention or watchful waiting for the management of asymptomatic mitral regurgitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2015;4:3: 220-229. Go to Citation PubMed Google Scholar
  13. [13]13. Cohen-Shelly M., Attia Z.I., Friedman P.A., et al. Electrocardiogram screening for aortic valve stenosis using artificial intelligence. Eur Heart J 2021;42:30: 2885-2896. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab153. PubMed Google Scholar a [...] the accurate detection of aortic stenosis, b [...] to analyze ECG waveform data to detect AS, c [...] in other studies of 0.85 and 0.88 for AS, d [...] data set and separate analyses for AS, e [...] VHD have used the keras-vis python package · DOI · Paper page
  14. [14]14. Kwon J.M., Lee S.Y., Jeon K.H., et al. Deep learning-based algorithm for detecting aortic stenosis using electrocardiography. J Am Heart Assoc 2020;9:7: e014717. Crossref Google Scholar a [...] the accurate detection of aortic stenosis, b [...] to analyze ECG waveform data to detect AS, c [...] in other studies of 0.85 and 0.88 for AS,
  15. [15]15. Adedinsewo D., Carter R.E., Attia Z., et al. Artificial intelligence-enabled ECG algorithm to identify patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction presenting to the emergency department with dyspnea. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2020;13:8: e008437. Go to Citation Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  16. [17]17. Attia Z.I., Noseworthy P.A., Lopez-Jimenez F., et al. An artificial intelligence-enabled ECG algorithm for the identification of patients with atrial fibrillation during sinus rhythm: a retrospective analysis of outcome prediction. Lancet 2019;394:10201: 861-867. Go to Citation Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  17. [18]18. Dujardin K.S., Enriquez-Sarano M., Schaff H.V., Bailey K.R., Seward J.B., Tajik A.J. Mortality and morbidity of aortic regurgitation in clinical practice. A long-term follow-up study. Circulation 1999;99:14: 1851-1857. Go to Citation Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  18. [19]19. Parcha V., Patel N., Kalra R., Suri S.S., Arora G., Arora P. Mortality due to mitral regurgitation among adults in the United States: 1999-2018. Mayo Clin Proc 2020;95:12: 2633-2643. Go to Citation Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  19. [20]20. Lundberg S., Lee S.-I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. 2017. arXiv:1705.07874 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017arXiv170507874L. Accessed May 1, 2017. Google Scholar a [...] and a composite of any of AS, AR, or MR). b [...] or MR) using the SHAP Gradient Explainer. · arXiv
  20. [21]21. Kwon J.M., Kim K.H., Akkus Z., Jeon K.H., Park J., Oh B.H. Artificial intelligence for detecting mitral regurgitation using electrocardiography. J Electrocardiol 2020;59:151-157. Crossref PubMed Google Scholar a [...] 14 MR, b [...] 0.82-0.88 for MR, c [...] or Grad-CAM techniques
  21. [22]22. Sawano S., Kodera S., Katsushika S., et al. Deep learning model to detect significant aortic regurgitation using electrocardiography. J Cardiol 2022;79:3: 334-341. Crossref PubMed Google Scholar a [...] 21 and AR. b [...] and 0.80 for AR.
  22. [24]24. Attia I.Z., Tseng A.S., Benavente E.D., et al. External validation of a deep learning electrocardiogram algorithm to detect ventricular dysfunction. Int J Cardiol 2021;329:130-135. Go to Citation Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  23. [26]26. Lee D.K., Marantz P.R., Devereux R.B., Kligfield P., Alderman M.H. Left ventricular hypertrophy in black and white hypertensives. Standard electrocardiographic criteria overestimate racial differences in prevalence. JAMA 1992;267:24: 3294-3299. Go to Citation Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  24. [27]27. Okin P.M., Wright J.T., Nieminen M.S., et al. Ethnic differences in electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy: the LIFE study. Losartan Intervention For Endpoint. Am J Hypertens 2002;15:8: 663-671. Go to Citation Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  25. [28]28. Hardt M., Price E., Srebro N. Equality of opportunity in supervised learning. 2016. arXiv:1610.02413 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016arXiv161002413H. Accessed October 1, 2016. Go to Citation Google Scholar · arXiv
  26. [29]29. Quer G., Arnaout R., Henne M., Arnaout R. Machine learning and the future of cardiovascular care: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021;77:3: 300-313. Go to Citation Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  27. [30]30. Marbach J.A., Almufleh A., Di Santo P., et al. Comparative accuracy of focused cardiac ultrasonography and clinical examination for left ventricular dysfunction and valvular heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2019;171:4: 264-272. Go to Citation Crossref PubMed Google Scholar Podcast cover Deep Learning Electrocardiographic Analysis For Detection of Left-Sided Valvular Heart Disease Valentin Fuster August 1, 2022 View full text|Download PDF Now Reading: Deep Learning Electrocardiographic Analysis for Detection of Left-Sided Valvular Heart Disease Share PREVIOUS ARTICLE Fit Is It for Longevity Across Populations∗ Previous NEXT ARTICLE The Future of AI-Enhanced ECG Interpretation for Valvular Heart Disease Screening∗ Next JACC THIS WEEK Deep Learning Electrocardiographic Analysis For Detection of Left-Sided Valvular Heart Disease 00:00:00

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elias, P., Poterucha, T. J., Rajaram, V., Moller, L. M., Rodriguez, V., Bhave, S., Hahn, R. T., Tison, G., Abreau, S. A., Barrios, J., Torres, J. N., Hughes, J. W., Perez, M. V., Finer, J., Kodali, S., Khalique, O., Hamid, N., Schwartz, A., Homma, S., Kumaraiah, D., Cohen, D. J., Maurer, M. S., Einstein, A. J., Nazif, T., Leon, M. B., & Perotte, A. J.
Affiliations
  • NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • St. Francis Hospital (US)
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-08
Volume
80
Issue
6
Pages
613-626
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4289313484
Cited by
153
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 4
FWCI
20.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Medtronic
  • National Institutes of Health (2T32HL007854-21)
  • Edwards Lifesciences
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL148248)
  • Boston Scientific Corporation
  • Janssen Pharmaceuticals
  • Abbott Laboratories
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Phonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques
Keywords
valvular heart disease, aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation, mitral regurgitation, electrocardiogram, deep learning, external validation
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Aortic Valve Insufficiency, Aortic Valve Stenosis, Electrocardiography, Heart Valve Diseases, Humans, Mitral Valve Insufficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review