Cited by 23Ethics and Social Impacts of AIArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMachine Learning in Healthcare

Mitigating bias in clinical machine learning models

Perez-Downes, Julio C., Tseng, Andrew S., McConn, Keith A., Elattar, Sara M., Sokumbi, Olayemi, Sebro, Ronnie A., Allyse, Megan A., Dangott, Bryan J. +2 more·2024·Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11936-023-01032-0

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perez-Downes, J. C., Tseng, A. S., McConn, K. A., Elattar, S. M., Sokumbi, O., Sebro, R. A., Allyse, M. A., Dangott, B. J., Carter, R. E., & Adedinsewo, D.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Adedinsewo, Demilade
Venue
Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine
Published
2024-02-10
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
29-45
ISSN
  • 1092-8464 (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-3189
OpenAlex
W4391722986
Cited by
23
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4
FWCI
7.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1 TR002377)
  • National Institutes of Health (K12 HD065987)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
algorithmic bias, machine learning in healthcare, bias mitigation, health equity, ethical considerations, clinical decision support, model generalization, responsible AI development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review