Cited by 95Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsDiabetes Treatment and Management

Semaglutide and NT-proBNP in Obesity-Related HFpEF

Open access
Petrie, Mark C., Borlaug, Barry A., Butler, Javed, Davies, Melanie J., Kitzman, Dalane W., Shah, Sanjiv J., Verma, Subodh, Jensen, Thomas Jon +10 more·2024·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, semaglutide, improved health status and reduced body weight in patients with obesity-related heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in the STEP-HFpEF (Semaglutide Treatment Effect in People with Obesity and HFpEF) program. Whether benefits were due to mechanical unloading or effects on HF pathobiology is uncertain. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine if semaglutide 2.4 mg reduced N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in patients with obesity-related HFpEF and compare treatment responses by baseline NT-proBNP. METHODS: This was a prespecified secondary analysis of pooled data from 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trials (STEP-HFpEF [Research Study to Investigate How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure and Obesity] and STEP-HFpEF DM [Research Study to Look at How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure, Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes]) testing effects of semaglutide in patients with obesity-related HFpEF. The main outcomes were change in NT-proBNP at 52 weeks and change in the dual primary endpoints of Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score and body weight by baseline NT-proBNP. RESULTS: In total, 1,145 patients were randomized. Semaglutide compared with placebo reduced NT-proBNP at 52 weeks (estimated treatment ratio: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.74-0.91; P = 0.0002). Improvements in health status were more pronounced in those with higher vs lower baseline NT-proBNP (estimated difference: tertile 1: 4.5 points, 95% CI: 0.8-8.2; tertile 2: 6.2 points, 95% CI: 2.4-10.0; tertile 3: 11.9 points, 95% CI: 8.1-15.7; P interaction = 0.02; baseline NT-proBNP as a continuous variable: P interaction = 0.004). Reductions in body weight were consistent across baseline NT-proBNP levels (P interaction = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with obesity-related HFpEF, semaglutide reduced NT-proBNP. Participants with higher baseline NT-proBNP had a similar degree of weight loss but experienced larger reductions in HF-related symptoms and physical limitations with semaglutide than those with lower NT-proBNP.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.04.022

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The median NT-proBNP in SUMMIT was significantly lower than in the STEP-HFpEF program (median ≈470 pg/mL) and substantially lower than in other large-scale outcome trials in HFpEF (median 900-1400 pg/mL).

    “This level was significantly lower than that in the STEP-HFpEF program (median, ≈470 pg/mL)36 and substantially lower than in other large-scale outcome trials in HFpEF (median 900–1400 pg/mL).3–6”
  • The magnitude of the decline in NT-proBNP in SUMMIT was less marked than the 18% decrease observed in the STEP-HFpEF trials, potentially because of lower baseline value and smaller decrease in body weight with semaglutide compared with tirzepatide.

    “The magnitude of the decline in NT-proBNP was less marked than the 18% decrease observed in the STEP-HFpEF trials,36 potentially because of our much lower baseline value and because of the smaller decrease in body weight produced by semaglutide (ie, ≈8%–9%) compared with tirzepatide.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Petrie, M. C., Borlaug, B. A., Butler, J., Davies, M. J., Kitzman, D. W., Shah, S. J., Verma, S., Jensen, T. J., Einfeldt, M. N., Liisberg, K., Perna, E., Sharma, K., Ezekowitz, J. A., Fu, M., Melenovský, V., Ito, H., Lelonek, M., & Kosiborod, M. N.
Affiliations
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
  • Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
  • Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine (CZ)
  • Kawasaki Medical School (JP)
  • Medical University of Lodz (PL)
  • Saint Luke's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Kosiborod, Mikhail N.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-07
Volume
84
Issue
1
Pages
27-40
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4396873474
Cited by
95
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 15
FWCI
28.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Novo Nordisk
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
semaglutide, NT-proBNP, obesity, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, GLP-1 receptor agonists, weight loss, health status, type 2 diabetes, natriuretic peptides, obesity cardiomyopathy, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, mechanical unloading, pathobiology
MeSH terms
Semaglutide, Aged, Double-Blind Method, Glucagon-Like Peptides, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Peptide Fragments, Stroke Volume, Treatment Outcome, Natriuretic Peptide, Brain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review