Cited by 125Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis ResearchVenomous Animal Envenomation and StudiesAllergic Rhinitis and Sensitization

Immune responses to mosquito saliva in 14 individuals with acute systemic allergic reactions to mosquito bites

Open access
Peng, Zhikang, Beckett, Andrew N., Engler, Renata J., Hoffman, Donald R., Ott, Nancy L., Simons, F. Estelle R.·2004·Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Abstract

Background Mosquito bite-induced acute systemic allergic reactions are an increasing clinical concern and have not been optimally characterized immunologically.Objective We wanted to study the immunologic basis of these reactions.Methods Sera were received from 14 individuals with a history of acute systemic allergic reactions to mosquito bites, defined as the presence of one or more of the following: urticaria, angioedema, wheezing, dyspnea, hypotension, and decrease or loss of consciousness. Ten individuals were from the United States and one each was from Canada, Germany, Japan, and Switzerland. An indirect ELISA was developed to measure specific IgE and IgG antibodies to saliva from 5 common mosquito species with different geographic distributions: Aedes aegypti, Aedes vexans, Aedes albopictus, Anopheles sinensis, and Culex quinquefasciatus. Twenty-nine individuals with negative bite test results from laboratory-reared mosquitoes served as control subjects.Results Mosquito saliva-specific IgE levels to all 5 species were significantly increased in the individuals with systemic allergic reactions compared with the control subjects ( P < .061 for Aedes vexans and P < .008 for the remaining 4 species). By using the mean of the control subjects plus 1 SD as a cut-off level, 11 individuals had positive results to Aedes albopictus and up to 4 additional species; 3 individuals had positive results to only one species. Saliva-specific IgG levels were not significantly increased in the individuals with systemic allergic reactions compared with levels seen in the control subjects ( P > .05).Conclusion Acute systemic allergic reactions to mosquito bites involve mosquito saliva-specific IgE and can be characterized immunologically. Aedes albopictus is the most common species associated with systemic allergic reactions to mosquito bites.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.08.014

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Severe reactions to mosquito bites can be local or systemic and can cause tissue necrosis, urticaria, inflammation of the mucous membranes, fever, lowering of blood pressure, loss of consciousness and other symptoms.

    “Severe reactions to mosquito bites can be local or systemic and can cause tissue necrosis, urticaria, inflammation of the mucous membranes, fever, lowering of blood pressure, loss of consciousness and other symptoms [5,6].”

    From North American Wetlands and Mosquito Control (2012) · cites this paper as [5]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Simons FER, Peng Z. Skeeter syndrome. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999; 104:705-7.
  2. Peng Z, Li H, Simons FER. Immunoblot analysis of salivary allergens in 10 mosquito species with worldwide distributions and the IgE responses to these allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1998;101:498-505.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peng, Z., Beckett, A. N., Engler, R. J., Hoffman, D. R., Ott, N. L., & Simons, F. E. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
  • Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (US)
  • East Carolina University (US)
Corresponding author
Peng, Zhikang
Venue
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-11
Volume
114
Issue
5
Pages
1189-1194
ISSN
0091-6749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991656751
Cited by
125
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2005-02-01)
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
Keywords
mosquito bite allergy, mosquito saliva, IgE antibodies, IgG, Aedes albopictus, Aedes aegypti, Aedes vexans, Anopheles sinensis, Culex quinquefasciatus, urticaria, angioedema
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adolescent, Adult, Animals, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Hypersensitivity, Immunoglobulin E, Immunoglobulin G, Insect Bites and Stings, Male, Culicidae, Saliva

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review