Cited by 51Asthma and respiratory diseasesAllergic Rhinitis and SensitizationIL-33, ST2, and ILC Pathways

Repressor of GATA regulates TH2-driven allergic airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness

Hirahara, Kiyoshi, Yamashita, Masakatsu, Iwamura, Chiaki, Shinoda, Kenta, Hasegawa, Akihiro, Yoshizawa, Hirohisa, Koseki, Haruhiko, Gejyo, Fumitake +1 more·2008·Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Abstract

Background Studies of human asthma and of animal models of allergic inflammation/asthma highlight a crucial role for T(H)2 cells in the pathogenesis of allergic asthma. Repressor of GATA (ROG) is a POZ (BTB) domain-containing Kruppel-type zinc finger family (or POK family) repressor. A repressive function to GATA3, a master transcription factor for T(H)2 cell differentiation, is indicated. Objective The aim of this study was to clarify the regulatory roles of ROG in the pathogenesis of T(H)2-driven allergic diseases, such as allergic asthma. Methods We examined allergic airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) in 3 different mouse models, which use either ROG-deficient (ROG(-/-)) mice, ROG transgenic mice, or adoptive transfer of cells. Results In ROG(-/-) mice T(H)2 cell differentiation, T(H)2 responses, eosinophilic airway inflammation, and AHR were enhanced. In ROG transgenic mice the levels of eosinophilic airway inflammation and AHR were dramatically reduced. Furthermore, adoptive transfer of T(H)2 cells with increased or decreased levels of ROG expression into the asthmatic mice resulted in reduced or enhanced airway inflammation, respectively. Conclusion These results indicate that ROG regulates allergic airway inflammation and AHR in a negative manner, and thus ROG might represent another potential therapeutic target for the treatment of asthmatic patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.06.004

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hirahara, K., Yamashita, M., Iwamura, C., Shinoda, K., Hasegawa, A., Yoshizawa, H., Koseki, H., Gejyo, F., & Nakayama, T.
Affiliations
  • Chiba University (JP)
  • Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital (JP)
  • RIKEN (JP)
  • Niigata University (JP)
Venue
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-09
Volume
122
Issue
3
Pages
512-520.e11
ISSN
0091-6749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972484309
Cited by
51
References
4
Citations by year
2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (17016010, 17390139, 18590466, 18890046, 19590491, 19591609, 19659121)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › IL-33, ST2, and ILC Pathways
Keywords
GATA3, Th2 cells, allergic asthma, allergic airway inflammation, airway hyperresponsiveness, eosinophilic inflammation, transcriptional regulation, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Animals, Asthma, Eosinophils, Inflammation, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Ovalbumin, Repressor Proteins, Bronchial Hyperreactivity, Mice, Knockout, Th2 Cells, GATA Transcription Factors, GATA3 Transcription Factor, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review