Cited by 23Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthCholesterol and Lipid MetabolismLipid metabolism and disorders

Lipid-lowering efficacy of obicetrapib: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

Masson, Walter, Barbagelata, Leandro, Lobo, Martin, Nogueira, Juan Patricio, Handelsman, Yehuda·2025·Journal of Clinical Lipidology

Abstract

Background Obicetrapib is a next-generation, oral, selective cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor known to significantly affect atherogenic lipoproteins, including low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), apolipoprotein B (ApoB), nonhigh-density lipoprotein cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]. Objective To evaluate the lipid-lowering efficacy of obicetrapib based on available evidence. Methods This systematic review was drafted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify randomized clinical trials assessing the lipid-lowering effects of obicetrapib compared to placebo. Fixed and random-effects models were used. Results Five randomized clinical trials (n = 288 patients) were included in this analysis. Patients treated with obicetrapib exhibited significantly greater reductions in LDL-C (mean difference [MD]: 41.4% [95% CI: 45.7 to -37.1]; I²: 6%), ApoB (MD: 26.5% [95% CI: 31.3 to -21.6]; I²: 45%), and Non-HDL-C (MD: 34.5% [95% CI: 37.0 to -31.6]; I²: 80%) compared to those receiving a placebo. Additionally, HDL-C levels were significantly higher in the obicetrapib group (MD: 157.4% [95% CI: 142.2 to 172.6]; I²: 69%). While triglyceride levels did not differ significantly between the 2 groups, Lp(a) levels were notably reduced with obicetrapib treatment (MD: 39.5% [95% CI: 54.6 to -24.3]; I²: 67%). Conclusion Obicetrapib is associated with sign…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacl.2024.12.016

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Masson, W., Barbagelata, L., Lobo, M., Nogueira, J. P., & Handelsman, Y.
Affiliations
  • Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (AR)
  • National University of Formosa (AR)
Corresponding author
Nogueira, Juan Patricio
Venue
Journal of Clinical Lipidology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-05
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
412-421
ISSN
  • 1876-4789 (ISSN-L)
  • 1933-2874
OpenAlex
W4405893484
Cited by
23
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 9
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of clinical lipidology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
Keywords
obicetrapib, cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors, lipid-lowering efficacy, LDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, non-HDL cholesterol, lipoprotein(a), HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, atherogenic lipoproteins, cardiovascular risk
MeSH terms
Anticholesteremic Agents, Hypolipidemic Agents, Apolipoproteins B, Humans, Cholesterol, LDL, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Lipoprotein(a), Cholesterol Ester Transfer Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review