Cited by 59Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationRadiology practices and educationRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Patient Perspectives and Priorities Regarding Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: Opportunities for Patient-Centered Radiology

Adams, Scott J., Tang, Rachel, Babyn, Paul·2020·Journal of the American College of Radiology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.01.007

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous empirical studies on patients' acceptance or trust in AI are somewhat conflicting.

    “The results of previous empirical studies on patients’ acceptance or trust in AI are somewhat conflicting. Some studies have shown that participants are more accepting of AI if it is proven to be more accurate than providers26,29 or if the use of AI fits societal and cultural norms.35,36 However, other studies have found that trust in AI did not increase when participants were informed that the AI”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adams, S. J., Tang, R., & Babyn, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Saskatchewan (CA)
  • Saskatchewan Health Authority (CA)
Corresponding author
Adams, Scott J.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Radiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
17
Issue
8
Pages
1034-1036
ISSN
1546-1440 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3006651584
Cited by
59
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Saskatchewan
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiology practices and education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Keywords
artificial intelligence in radiology, patient perspectives, patient-centered care, patient priorities, radiology workflow, automated reporting, lesion detection, lesion characterization, patient scheduling
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Radiography, Radiology, Patient-Centered Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review