The dexamethasone suppression test as a predictor of suicidal behavior in unipolar depression
Abstract
Background Non-suppression on the dexamethasone suppression test (DST) in unipolar depression has been found to be associated with completed suicide, with less consistent data for attempted suicide and hospitalizations for suicidality. The purpose of this study was to examine DST non-suppression as a predictor of these three aspects of suicidal behavior.Methods Records were reviewed for 101 patients who met criteria for major depressive disorder and/or dysthymic disorder and had a DST performed. All patients were treated naturalistically and were followed for an average of 2 years. DST suppressors and non-suppressors were compared with respect to three outcomes: (1) completed suicide; (2) attempted suicide; and (3) hospitalizations for suicidality.Results DST non-suppressors were significantly more likely to have completed suicide or be hospitalized for suicidality than DST suppressors, with a non-significant trend for attempts. Total suicidal events were also significantly more frequent in the non-suppressor group.Limitations Axis II diagnoses and severity of illness were not assessed. Knowledge of DST results may have influenced the decision to hospitalize patients.Conclusions DST non-suppression identifies unipolar depressed patients with a higher risk for future suicide completion or hospitalization for suicidality. Performance of DST upon initiation of treatment may be a useful adjunct in identifying suicidal risk.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nonsuppression on the dexamethasone suppression test predicts suicide, but there is disagreement about nonfatal attempts.
“Nonsuppression on the dexamethasone suppression test, which assesses this HPA axis glucocorticoid receptor feedback loop, predicts suicide (151-153), but there is disagreement about nonfatal attempts (154-158).”
From A brain-centric model of suicidal behavior (2020) · cites this paper as [153]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 93
- Authors
- Yerevanian, B. I., Feusner, J. D., Koek, R. J., & Mintz, J.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Yerevanian, Boghos I.
- Venue
- Journal of Affective Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 103-108
- ISSN
- 0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2149217655
- Cited by
- 93
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 7.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Keywords
- dexamethasone suppression test, major depressive disorder, suicidal behavior, suicide mortality, suicide attempts, dysthymia, suicide risk prediction, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, naturalistic treatment
- MeSH terms
- Suicide Prevention, Adult, Ambulatory Care, Major Depressive Disorder, Dexamethasone, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hospitalization, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Suicide, Suicide, Attempted, Los Angeles, Hospital Mortality, Risk Assessment, Dysthymic Disorder
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review