Cited by 33Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Clinical correlates of depersonalization symptoms in patients with bipolar disorder

Mula, Marco, Pini, Stefano, Preve, Matteo, Masini, Matteo, Giovannini, Ilaria, Cassano, Giovanni B.·2009·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Prevalence and clinical correlates of dissociative symptoms in general, and depersonalization (DP) in particular, in patients with mood disorders have received limited attention in the literature. Nevertheless, the identification of these symptoms may have important implications in terms of a better definition of clinical endophenotypes. Thus, this study aimed at investigating frequency and clinical correlates of dissociative symptoms, with special attention to DP symptoms, in patients with bipolar disorder (BD) looking specifically at differences between BD-I and BD-II and the comorbidity with panic disorder. Methods The study sample included 91 adult patients with BD (BD-I=43; BD-II=48) assessed with the Semi-structured Clinical Interview for Temperament (TEMPS-I), the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES) and the Structured Clinical Interview for Depersonalization-Derealization Spectrum (SCI-DER). Results There was no difference in lifetime dissociative experiences or DP symptoms between BD-I and BD-II patients. There was no difference in relation to temperament characteristics. Lifetime DP symptoms, as assessed with the SCI-DER, were associated to an early onset of the BD (beta=-0.436, t=-4.572, p<0.001). Derealization symptoms correlated with panic disorder comorbidity (OR=1.22; 95%CI=1.03-1.46, Wald=5.177, p=0.023). Conclusions Our study suggests that lifetime DP symptoms are correlated with an early onset of the BD and derealization symptoms with panic disorder comorbidity, bearing the opportunity to identify patients with a specific profile for a better clinical and neurobiological definition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2008.08.001

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mula, M., Pini, S., Preve, M., Masini, M., Giovannini, I., & Cassano, G. B.
Affiliations
University of Pisa (IT)
Corresponding author
Mula, Marco
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05
Volume
115
Issue
1-2
Pages
252-256
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087482773
Cited by
33
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
depersonalization, bipolar disorder, bipolar I disorder, bipolar II disorder, dissociative symptoms, derealization, early onset, temperament, endophenotypes, Dissociative Experiences Scale
MeSH terms
Adult, Bipolar Disorder, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depersonalization, Dissociative Disorders, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Comorbidity, Panic Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review