Cited by 78Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyMental Health Treatment and AccessReligion and Society Interactions

Religious attendance and social adjustment as protective against depression: A 10-year prospective study

Open access
Barton, Yakov A., Miller, Lisa, Wickramaratne, Priya, Gameroff, Marc J., Weissman, Myrna M.·2013·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Previous research has identified elevated social adjustment and frequent religious attendance as protective against depression. The present study aims to examine the association of frequency of religious services attendance with subsequent depression, while accounting for the effects of social adjustment.Method Participants were 173 adult offspring of depressed and nondepressed parents, followed longitudinally over 25 years. Diagnosis was assessed with the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Lifetime Version. The Social Adjustment Scale-Self Report (SAS-SR) was used to assess social adjustment and frequency of religious services attendance was self-reported. In a logistic regression analysis, major depression at 20 years was used as the outcome measure and the frequency of religious services attendance and social adjustment variables at 10 years as predictors.Results Frequent religious services attendance was found to protect against subsequent depression at a trend level. High functioning social adjustment was found to protect against subsequent depression, especially within the immediate and extended family. Adults without a depressed parent who reported attending religious services atleast once a month had a lower likelihood of subsequent depression. Among adults with a depressed parent, those with high functioning social adjustment had a lower likelihood of subsequent depression.Limitations Measurement of social adjustment was non-specific to religious services.Conclusions Frequent religious attendance may protect against major depression, independent from the effects of social adjustment. This protective quality may be attenuated in adults with a depressed parent. High functioning social adjustment may be protective only among offspring of depressed parents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2012.08.037

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Spiritual beliefs, religious involvement, or perceived support from a religious or spiritual community may have a buffering effect on mental health and may result in fewer symptoms of depression.

    “Spiritual beliefs, religious involvement, or perceived support from a religious or spiritual community, may have a buffering effect on mental health, and may result in fewer symptoms of depression (e.g., Kim and Esquivel, 2011; Barton et al., 2013).”

    From A hope intervention for adolescents: a randomized controlled trial delivered by paraprofessionals (2025) · cites this paper as Barton et al., 2013

    The Discussion reports that attending religious services at least monthly was associated with a lower likelihood of major depression over ten years, although the association was at a trend level. The paper does not establish the same effect for spiritual beliefs or perceived support from a religious or spiritual community; its Abstract notes that social adjustment was not measured specifically in religious settings. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barton, Y. A., Miller, L., Wickramaratne, P., Gameroff, M. J., & Weissman, M. M.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Weissman, Myrna M.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-03
Volume
146
Issue
1
Pages
53-57
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2108171021
Cited by
78
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)
Funders
  • John Templeton Foundation
  • National Institute of Mental Health (2 R01 MH36197)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
Keywords
religious service attendance, social adaptation, depression, protective factors, offspring of depressed parents, family functioning, major depressive disorder, prospective cohort
MeSH terms
Adult, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Religion and Psychology, Social Adjustment, Child of Impaired Parents, Risk Assessment, Adult Children, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review