Cited by 38Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentMental Health Research TopicsPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

The temporal course and clinical correlates of subjective impulsivity in bipolar disorder as revealed through ecological momentary assessment

Open access
Depp, Colin A., Moore, Raeanne C., Dev, Sheena I., Mausbach, Brent T., Eyler, Lisa T., Granholm, Eric L.·2016·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Impulsivity is frequently linked with bipolar disorder and is associated with mania and negative outcomes. The temporal dynamics of subjective impulsivity are unclear, in particular whether impulsivity precedes or follows changes in positive or negative affect. Methods A total of 41 outpatients with bipolar disorder (I or II) were provided with mobile devices for 11 weeks and completed twice-daily surveys about affective states and subjective impulsivity. We examined the association between aggregate subjective impulsivity with baseline global cognitive function, suicide risk ratings, and medication adherence, as well as concurrent and lagged associations with momentary positive and negative affect ratings. Results A total of 2902 ratings were available across study subjects. Higher aggregate mean ratings of impulsivity were associated with worse baseline global cognitive function, prior suicide attempts, and self-reported problems with medication adherence, as well as more severe manic (but not depressive) symptoms. Time-lagged models indicated that greater negative affect, but not positive affect, predicted subsequent increases in subjective impulsivity, which, in turn, predicted diminished positive affect. Limitations Other measures of impulsivity with which to validate subjective ratings were unavailable and the sample was restricted to generally clinically stable outpatients. Conclusions Subjective impulsivity as measured by daily monitoring was associated with worse cognitive function and self-rated medication adherence, and higher suicide risk ratings. Impulsivity may be a maladaptive strategy to regulate negative affect in bipolar disorder.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2015.12.016

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • EMA has advantages over one-time in-clinic measures, including generating more stable estimates of neurobehavioural symptoms for outcomes research, assessing dynamic changes among theoretically linked constructs, reducing recall bias for patients with neurobehavioural disorders, and enabling modeling of causal intra-individual relationships.

    “This approach has many advantages87 over “one-time, in-clinic” measures, including the generation of more stable estimates of neurobehavioural symptoms for outcomes research;88 the assessment of dynamic changes among theoretically linked constructs;89 the reduction of recall bias for patients with neurobehavioural disorders;90,91 and the ability to model causal intra-individual relationships.92”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Depp, C. A., Moore, R. C., Dev, S. I., Mausbach, B. T., Eyler, L. T., & Granholm, E. L.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Depp, Colin A.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
193
Pages
145-150
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2207211350
Cited by
38
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH077225, K23MH077225, K23MH107260, MH103318, MH107260, L30 MH104725, R01MH100417, MH100417, R01MH103318, T32MH019934)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
bipolar disorder, negative affect, positive affect, mania, suicide risk, medication adherence, cognitive function, emotion regulation, ecological momentary assessment, mobile health monitoring
MeSH terms
Adult, Bipolar Disorder, Cognition, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Suicide, Attempted, Time Factors, Medication Adherence, Self Report, Symptom Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review