Cited by 63Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyMental Health Research Topics

A Preliminary Examination of the Role of Emotion Differentiation in the Relationship Between Borderline Personality and Urges for Maladaptive Behaviors

Open access
Dixon-Gordon, Katherine L., Chapman, Alexander L., Weiss, Nicole H., Rosenthal, M. Zachary·2014·Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

Abstract

Background and objectives Impulsive, maladaptive, and potentially self-damaging behaviors are a hallmark feature of borderline personality (BP) pathology. Difficulties with emotion regulation have been implicated in both BP pathology and maladaptive behaviors. One facet of emotion regulation that may be particularly important in the relation between BP pathology and urges for maladaptive behaviors is emotion differentiation. Methods Over one day, 84 participants high (n = 34) and low (n = 50) in BP pathology responded to questions regarding state emotions and urges to engage in maladaptive behaviors using handheld computers, in addition to a measure of emotion-related difficulties controlling impulsive behaviors. Results Results revealed that individuals high in BP pathology reported greater emotion-related impulsivity as well as daily urges to engage in maladaptive behaviors. However, the association between BP group and both baseline emotion-related impulsivity and daily urges for maladaptive behaviors was strongest among individuals who had low levels of positive emotion differentiation. Conversely, negative emotion differentiation did not significantly moderate the relationships between BP group and either emotion-related difficulties controlling impulsive behaviors or state urges for maladaptive behaviors. Limitations Limitations to the present study include the reliance upon an analogue sample and the relatively brief monitoring period. Conclusions Despite limitations, these results suggest that, among individuals with high BP pathology, the ability to differentiate between positive emotions may be a particularly important target in the reduction of maladaptive behaviors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10862-014-9423-4

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In that study, negative emotion differentiation did not significantly moderate either of these relations.

    “Interestingly negative emotion differentiation did not significantly moderate either of these relations.”

    From Decoupling as a Mechanism of Change in Mindfulness and Acceptance: A Literature Review (2015) · cites this paper as Dixon-Gordon et al., 2014

  • In an EMA study with 34 college students with high BPD symptoms and 50 with low, positive emotion differentiation moderated such that BPD symptom level related to both impulsivity and urges to engage in problem behaviors only among those lower in positive emotion differentiation; these variables were not related at high levels of differentiation.

    “There were two significant moderation effects with positive emotion differentiation such that BPD symptom level related to both impulsivity and urges to engage in problem behaviors only among those lower in positive emotion differentiation; these variables were not related at high levels of differentiation.”

    From Decoupling as a Mechanism of Change in Mindfulness and Acceptance: A Literature Review (2015) · cites this paper as Dixon-Gordon et al., 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Cyders MA Smith GT 2008 Emotion-based dispositions to rash action: The trait of urgency Psychological Bulletin 134 807 828 18954158 PMC2705930
  2. Hilbe JM 2007 Negative Binomial Regressio Cambridge University Press
  3. Longford NT 1993 Regression analysis of multilevel data with measurement error British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 46 2 301 311

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dixon-Gordon, K. L., Chapman, A. L., Weiss, N. H., & Rosenthal, M. Z.
Affiliations
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Venue
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
Published
2014-04-22
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
616-625
ISSN
  • 0164-0305 (ISSN-L)
  • 0882-2689
  • 1573-3505
OpenAlex
W1997502280
Cited by
63
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Simon Fraser University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (T32DA019426)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
borderline personality disorder, emotion differentiation, emotion regulation, emotion-related impulsivity, negative emotion differentiation, state emotions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review