Cited by 85Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Prevalence of postpartum depressive symptoms during the first 6 months postpartum: Association with maternal age and parity

Iwata, Hiroko, Mori, Emi, Sakajo, Akiko, Aoki, Kyoko, Maehara, Kunie, Tamakoshi, Koji·2016·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Depressive symptoms are common in postpartum women. The present study aimed to describe changes in the prevalence of depressive symptoms during the first 6 months postpartum, and their association with maternal age and parity. Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted with 3769 women at 13 hospitals in Japan. Depressive symptoms were measured during hospital stay and at 1, 2, 4, and 6 months postpartum, using the Japanese version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). The effects of maternal age and parity were assessed by comparing four groups: younger primiparas (aged Results Mean EPDS scores significantly decreased from 1 to 2 months postpartum in all groups. The proportion of women with EPDS scores ≥9 significantly decreased during the same period for primiparas but not for multiparas. Primiparas also had significantly higher EPDS scores than multiparas during hospital stay and at 1 month postpartum. Limitations As we used convenience sampling, our study sample was not fully representative of Japanese mothers. This study was also limited by our focus on the postpartum period. Conclusions The first month postpartum represented peak prevalence for depressive symptoms. Primiparity was a risk factor for depressive symptoms only during the first month postpartum. Healthcare professionals should be sensitive to postpartum duration and parity when monitoring depressive symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2016.06.002

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iwata, H., Mori, E., Sakajo, A., Aoki, K., Maehara, K., & Tamakoshi, K.
Affiliations
  • Chiba University (JP)
  • Nagoya University (JP)
Corresponding author
Iwata, Hiroko
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-10
Volume
203
Pages
227-232
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2415808754
Cited by
85
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
postpartum depression, depressive symptoms, maternal age, parity, primiparity, multiparity, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, postpartum period, prevalence, risk factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Japan, Maternal Age, Mothers, Parity, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Time Factors, Prevalence, Depression, Postpartum, Postpartum Period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review