Dietary n-3 PUFA, fish consumption and depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
Open accessAbstract
Background Fish consumption and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) have been hypothesized to exert preventive effects toward depressive disorders, but findings are contrasting. We aimed to systematically review and perform meta-analysis of results from observational studies exploring the association between fish, n-3 PUFA dietary intake, and depression.Methods A search on the main bibliographic source of the observational studies up to August 2015 was performed. Random-effects models of the highest versus the lowest (reference) category of exposure and dose-response meta-analysis were performed.Results A total of 31 studies including 255,076 individuals and over 20,000 cases of depression, were examined. Analysis of 21 datasets investigating relation between fish consumption and depression resulted in significant reduced risk (RR=0.78, 95% CI: 0.69, 0.89), with a linear dose-response despite with moderate heterogeneity. Pooled risk estimates of depression for extreme categories of both total n-3 PUFA and fish-derived n-3 PUFA [eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)+docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)] resulted in decreased risk for the highest compared with the lowest intake (RR=0.78, 95% CI: 0.67, 0.92 and RR=0.82, 95% CI: 0.73, 0.92, respectively) and dose-response analysis revealed a J-shaped association with a peak decreased risk for 1.8g/d intake of n-3 PUFA (RR=0.30, 95% CI: 0.09, 0.98).Limitation Design of the studies included and confounding due to lack adjustment for certain variables may exist.Conclusions The present analysis supports the hypothesis that dietary n-3 PUFA intake are associated with lower risk of depression.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Greater dietary EPA and DHA intake is associated with significantly lower prospective risk of depression (RR=0.74, 95% CI 0.61-0.89).
“dietary eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) (n=4, RR=0.74, 95% CI: 0.61-0.89, I²=0) 65”
From A meta-review of "lifestyle psychiatry": the role of exercise, smoking, diet and sleep in the prevention and treatment of mental disorders (2020) · cites this paper as [65]
Dietary omega3 fatty acids intake is associated with lower prospective risk of depression, approaching significance (RR=0.85, 95% CI 0.73-1.00).
“while associations with dietary omega3 fatty acids also approached significance (n=7, RR=0.85, 95% CI: 0.73-1.00, I²=19%) 65 .”
From A meta-review of "lifestyle psychiatry": the role of exercise, smoking, diet and sleep in the prevention and treatment of mental disorders (2020) · cites this paper as [65]
According to epidemiological and clinical studies, reduced dietary intake of fatty acids, especially ω3, is associated with mood disorders and depression.
“According to both epidemiological and clinical studies, a reduced dietary intake of fatty acids, especially ω3, is associated with mood disorders and depression [446,447,448,449].”
From The Interplay between Gut Microbiota and Parkinson’s Disease: Implications on Diagnosis and Treatment (2022) · cites this paper as [447]
Higher n-3 consumption is linked with lower prevalence and severity of mood disturbances in humans.
“Several reports link higher n-3 consumption with lower prevalence and severity of mood disturbances in humans [45] and demonstrate that n-3 supplementation dampens neuroinflammation and attenuates behavioral indices of mood deficits in rodents [46,47].”
From The menace of obesity to depression and anxiety prevalence (2022) · cites this paper as [45]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 76 · Cited by 244
- Authors
- Grosso, G., Micek, A., Marventano, S., Castellano, S., Mistretta, A., Pajak, A., & Galvano, F.
- Affiliations
- Policlinico Universitario di Catania (IT)
- Jagiellonian University (PL)
- University of Catania (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Marventano, Stefano
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Affective Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-11
- Volume
- 205
- Pages
- 269-281
- ISSN
- 0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2509111386
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 3.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- ruj.uj.edu.pl
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Homo Politicus (Academy of Humanities and Economics in Lodz) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Jagiellonian University Repository (Jagiellonian University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- omega-3 fatty acids, fish consumption, depression, eicosapentaenoic acid, docosahexaenoic acid, dietary intake, dose-response relationship, J-shaped association, depression risk
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Depressive Disorder, Diet, Fishes, Humans, Risk, Fatty Acids, Omega-3, Prevalence, Observational Studies as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review