Cited by 94Disability Education and EmploymentEmployment and Welfare StudiesSchizophrenia research and treatment

Supported employment adapted for people with affective disorders—A randomized controlled trial

Bejerholm, Ulrika, Larsson, Maria E., Johanson, Suzanne·2017·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background While effective vocational methods for gaining employment exist for people with schizophrenia and similar conditions, no evidence exists with regard to people with affective disorders. We aimed to study the effectiveness of a newly developed Individual Enabling and Support (IES) model adapted for the target group and compared to traditional vocational rehabilitation (TVR).Methods An assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a parallel design was performed. Sixty-one participants received IES or TVR. The primary outcome was employment rate at 12-month follow-up. Secondary vocational outcomes, depression severity, and quality of life were also studied. Trial register number is ISRCTN93470551.Results IES was more effective for employment compared to TVR (42.4% vs. 4%; difference 38%, 95% CI 0.12-0.55). Significant group differences were present in secondary vocational outcomes (hours and weeks employed, time to employment), and depression severity. The IES-group had significantly lowering in depression scores and increased quality of life scores during the intervention period.Limitations This RCT was limited by the small sample size due to restriction of recruitment to middle-sized cities within geographically diverse sites in southern Sweden. Larger trials are needed, also in primary health care and employment services settings.Conclusions IES is more effective than TVR for attaining employment and improving depressive symptoms. On a societal level, IES closes the time and service gap between treatment and employment, and thus lowers sick-leave costs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2016.08.028

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 69 · Cited by 94

Authors
Bejerholm, U., Larsson, M. E., & Johanson, S.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
Corresponding author
Bejerholm, Ulrika
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
207
Pages
212-220
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2528917159
Cited by
94
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4
FWCI
16.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
supported employment, mood disorders, vocational rehabilitation, employment rate, depression severity, quality of life, time to employment, sick leave costs
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Rehabilitation, Vocational, Single-Blind Method, Employment, Supported, Treatment Outcome, Mood Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review