Cited by 40Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsBehavioral Health and Interventions

Comprehensive self-control training benefits depressed college students: A six-month randomized controlled intervention trial

Yang, Xueling, Zhao, Jiubo, Chen, Yu, Zu, Simeng, Zhao, Jingbo·2018·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Depressive disorder was associated with dysfunctional self-regulation. The current study attempted to design and test a comprehensive self-control training (CSCT) program with an overall emphasis on behaviral activation in depressed Chinese college students. Methods Participants included 74 students who had diagnosed with major depression, they were randomly assigned to one of the two groups: intervention group (n=37), and control group (n=37). The intervention participants received an eight-week CSCT and four-month follow-up consolidation program, as compared to the control group who received only pre-post-and-follow-up measurements. All participants measured Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-Ⅱ) and Self-control Scale (SCS) at three time points: baseline, post-training, and four-month follow-up. Results The dropout rates were 6 (8.1%) in the intervention group and 3 (4.1%) in the control group at the end of six-month intervention. The general linear model repeated measures analysis of variance revealed that comparing with the control group, the intervention group participants had more increase in their trait self-control score, at the meantime, their depressive symptoms had significantly improved. Univariate and logistic regression analyses revealed that participants with milder baseline depressive symptoms were more likely to benefit from CSCT interventions; depression improvement was also associated with the number of sessions attended. Limitations The main limitat…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2017.10.014

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, X., Zhao, J., Chen, Y., Zu, S., & Zhao, J.
Affiliations
  • Southern Medical University (CN)
  • Jinan University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Yang, Xueling
  • Zhao, Jingbo
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
226
Pages
251-260
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2763275966
Cited by
40
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Philosophy and Social Science of Guangdong Province, China (GD14CXL02)
  • Social Sciences Research of Ministry of Education, China (14YJA190013)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
self-control training, major depressive disorder, university students, behavioral activation, self-regulation, depressive symptoms, intervention adherence
MeSH terms
Self-Control, Adolescent, Major Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Education as Topic, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Self Care, Students, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review