Cited by 105Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesBehavioral Health and InterventionsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Regulatory focus and anxiety: a self-regulatory model of GAD-depression comorbidity

Open access
Klenk, Megan M., Strauman, Timothy J., Higgins, E. Tory·2011·Personality and Individual Differences

Abstract

The etiology of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), including its high degree of comorbidity with major depressive disorder (MDD), remains a conceptual and clinical challenge. In this article, we discuss the relevance of regulatory focus theory, an influential theory of self-regulation, for understanding vulnerability to GAD as well as GAD/MDD comorbidity. The theory postulates two systems for pursuing desired end states: the promotion and prevention systems. Drawing upon studies documenting the affective and motivational consequences of failing to attain promotion versus prevention goals, as well as the literature linking promotion failure with depression, we propose how dysfunction within the prevention system could lead to GAD - with, as well as without, MDD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2010.12.003

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klenk, M. M., Strauman, T. J., & Higgins, E. T.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Strauman, Timothy J.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-05
Volume
50
Issue
7
Pages
935-943
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2036025989
Cited by
105
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
9.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DukeSpace (Duke University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R24MH067447, R21MH052281)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
regulatory focus, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, self-regulation, promotion focus, prevention focus, anxiety, depression, motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review